Skip to content

meta(gha): Deploy action stale.yml #3991

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 14, 2021
Merged

Conversation

chadwhitacre
Copy link
Member

I are a bot, here to deploy stale.yml. 🤖

Copy link
Member

@AbhiPrasad AbhiPrasad left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🚀

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Sep 20, 2021

size-limit report

Path Size
@sentry/browser - CDN Bundle (gzipped) 22.33 KB (-0.01% 🔽)
@sentry/browser - Webpack 23.31 KB (0%)
@sentry/react - Webpack 23.34 KB (0%)
@sentry/browser + @sentry/tracing - CDN Bundle (gzipped) 29.79 KB (0%)

Copy link
Contributor

@vladanpaunovic vladanpaunovic left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.
Thanks @chadwhitacre! 🚀

@chadwhitacre
Copy link
Member Author

chadwhitacre commented Sep 20, 2021

@AbhiPrasad @vladanpaunovic When we merge this it will cause a flood of old issues to be marked stale. Are you ready for that? If you want, you can review old issues and apply Status: Backlog to any that you know you want to keep. Otherwise, expect 200+ bot comments and notifications from GitHub! 😅

Let me know ...

@lobsterkatie
Copy link
Member

To Chad's point, I think we need to do at least a surface once-over before we pull the trigger on this. FWIW I would set a longer threshold on the staleness, also, but regardless, a chance for us to mark things "backlog" before we do this would be good.

I'd also vote for an additional, non-status no-stale tag or something, because there are sometimes issues we want to keep open where the actual status (blocked, waiting for information, etc) is useful to know, and having to lose that information to keep the issue from closing feels like a step back from the better tagging we've been doing.

@vladanpaunovic vladanpaunovic merged commit 952850f into master Oct 14, 2021
@vladanpaunovic vladanpaunovic deleted the bot/deploy-3fbff234 branch October 14, 2021 10:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants