fixup! Test the support for incremental actors in the PowerManager

Signed-off-by: Sahas Subramanian <[email protected]>

Author: shsms

tests/timeseries/_battery_pool/test_battery_pool_control_methods.py

@@ -498,7 +498,7 @@ async def test_case_5(  # pylint: disable=too-many-statements
         """Test case 5.
 
         - four battery pools with same batteries, but different priorities.
-        - two battery pools are incremental, two are not.
+        - two battery pools are in the shifting group, two are not.
         - all batteries are working.
         """
         set_power = typing.cast(
@@ -531,8 +531,8 @@ async def test_case_5(  # pylint: disable=too-many-statements
             await bounds_1_rx.receive(), power=None, lower=-4000.0, upper=4000.0
         )
 
-        # The target power of non-incremental battery pools should only be visible to
-        # other non-incremental battery pools, and vice-versa.
+        # The target power of non-shifting battery pools should only be visible to other
+        # non-shifting battery pools, and vice-versa.
         await battery_pool_2.propose_power(
             Power.from_watts(200.0),
             bounds=timeseries.Bounds(
@@ -558,8 +558,8 @@ async def test_case_5(  # pylint: disable=too-many-statements
         ]
         set_power.reset_mock()
 
-        # Set a power to the second non-incremental battery pool.  This should also have
-        # no effect on the higher-priority incremental battery pools.
+        # Set a power to the second non-shifting battery pool.  This should also have
+        # no effect on the shifting battery pools.
         await battery_pool_1.propose_power(
             Power.from_watts(720.0),
         )
@@ -595,9 +595,9 @@ async def test_case_5(  # pylint: disable=too-many-statements
         ]
         set_power.reset_mock()
 
-        # Setting power to an incremental battery pool should shift the bounds of the
-        # non-incremental battery pools to adjust for the target power of the incremental
-        # battery pools.
+        # Setting power to a shifting battery pool should shift the bounds seen by the
+        # non-shifting battery pools.  It would also shift the final target power sent
+        # in the batteries.
         await battery_pool_3.propose_power(
             Power.from_watts(-1000.0),
         )
@@ -634,25 +634,25 @@ async def test_case_5(  # pylint: disable=too-many-statements
         ]
         set_power.reset_mock()
 
-        # Creating a new non-incremental battery pool that's higher priority than the
-        # incremental actors should shift the bounds of the incremental actors, because
-        # the non-incremental battery pools will already have a target power.
+        # Creating a new non-shifting battery pool that's higher priority than the
+        # shifting battery pools should still be shifted by the target power of the
+        # shifting battery pools.
         battery_pool_5 = microgrid.battery_pool(priority=5)
         bounds_5_rx = battery_pool_5.power_status.new_receiver()
 
         await battery_pool_5.propose_power(None)
 
         self._assert_report(
-            await bounds_5_rx.receive(), power=720.0, lower=-4000.0, upper=4000.0
+            await bounds_5_rx.receive(), power=720.0, lower=-3000.0, upper=5000.0
         )
         self._assert_report(
-            await bounds_4_rx.receive(), power=-1000.0, lower=-4720.0, upper=3280.0
+            await bounds_4_rx.receive(), power=-1000.0, lower=-4000.0, upper=4000.0
         )
         self._assert_report(
-            await bounds_3_rx.receive(), power=-1000.0, lower=-4720.0, upper=3280.0
+            await bounds_3_rx.receive(), power=-1000.0, lower=-4000.0, upper=4000.0
         )
         self._assert_report(
-            await bounds_2_rx.receive(), power=720.0, lower=-4000.0, upper=4000.0
+            await bounds_2_rx.receive(), power=720.0, lower=-3000.0, upper=5000.0
         )
         self._assert_report(
             await bounds_1_rx.receive(), power=720.0, lower=-1000.0, upper=1500.0