Skip to content

Support RateLimiters and ReadOnly for DriveMounts #296

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
sipsma opened this issue Oct 17, 2019 · 0 comments · Fixed by #332
Closed

Support RateLimiters and ReadOnly for DriveMounts #296

sipsma opened this issue Oct 17, 2019 · 0 comments · Fixed by #332
Assignees
Labels
kind/enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@sipsma
Copy link
Contributor

sipsma commented Oct 17, 2019

The first iteration of support for DriveMounts leaves out RateLimiter and IsReadOnly settings for the drives due to the fact that doing so requires significant refactoring of the stubdrive code (as RateLimiter and IsReadOnly settings cannot be updated via a Patch call).

Right now, users can still specify that a filesystem be bind-mounted as read-only into their container, but they don't have any options for the rate-limiter currently.

@sipsma sipsma self-assigned this Oct 17, 2019
@sipsma sipsma added the kind/enhancement New feature or request label Oct 17, 2019
sipsma added a commit to sipsma/firecracker-containerd that referenced this issue Oct 17, 2019
This implements the proposal found in docs/drive-mounts-proposal.md, with the
exception for supporting RateLimiters and IsReadOnly in the DriveMount objects,
due to the need for further refactoring of the internal stub drive code (will
be followed up in firecracker-microvm#296).

Signed-off-by: Erik Sipsma <[email protected]>
sipsma added a commit to sipsma/firecracker-containerd that referenced this issue Oct 21, 2019
This implements the proposal found in docs/drive-mounts-proposal.md, with the
exception for supporting RateLimiters and IsReadOnly in the DriveMount objects,
due to the need for further refactoring of the internal stub drive code (will
be followed up in firecracker-microvm#296).

Signed-off-by: Erik Sipsma <[email protected]>
sipsma added a commit to sipsma/firecracker-containerd that referenced this issue Oct 21, 2019
This implements the proposal found in docs/drive-mounts-proposal.md, with the
exception for supporting RateLimiters and IsReadOnly in the DriveMount objects,
due to the need for further refactoring of the internal stub drive code (will
be followed up in firecracker-microvm#296).

Signed-off-by: Erik Sipsma <[email protected]>
sipsma added a commit to sipsma/firecracker-containerd that referenced this issue Oct 24, 2019
This implements the proposal found in docs/drive-mounts-proposal.md, with the
exception for supporting RateLimiters and IsReadOnly in the DriveMount objects,
due to the need for further refactoring of the internal stub drive code (will
be followed up in firecracker-microvm#296).

Signed-off-by: Erik Sipsma <[email protected]>
sipsma added a commit to sipsma/firecracker-containerd that referenced this issue Oct 24, 2019
This implements the proposal found in docs/drive-mounts-proposal.md, with the
exception for supporting RateLimiters and IsReadOnly in the DriveMount objects,
due to the need for further refactoring of the internal stub drive code (will
be followed up in firecracker-microvm#296).

Signed-off-by: Erik Sipsma <[email protected]>
sipsma added a commit to sipsma/firecracker-containerd that referenced this issue Oct 25, 2019
This implements the proposal found in docs/drive-mounts-proposal.md, with the
exception for supporting RateLimiters and IsReadOnly in the DriveMount objects,
due to the need for further refactoring of the internal stub drive code (will
be followed up in firecracker-microvm#296).

Signed-off-by: Erik Sipsma <[email protected]>
sipsma added a commit to sipsma/firecracker-containerd that referenced this issue Nov 6, 2019
This implements the proposal found in docs/drive-mounts-proposal.md, with the
exception for supporting RateLimiters and IsReadOnly in the DriveMount objects,
due to the need for further refactoring of the internal stub drive code (will
be followed up in firecracker-microvm#296).

Signed-off-by: Erik Sipsma <[email protected]>
sipsma added a commit to sipsma/firecracker-containerd that referenced this issue Nov 7, 2019
This implements the proposal found in docs/drive-mounts-proposal.md, with the
exception for supporting RateLimiters and IsReadOnly in the DriveMount objects,
due to the need for further refactoring of the internal stub drive code (will
be followed up in firecracker-microvm#296).

Signed-off-by: Erik Sipsma <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind/enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant