Cookie example does not work for .Net 8 template because the state container does not instantiate in user scope

[kaleidocore]

Description

This example does not seem to work with the .Net 8 Blazor template, i.e. when using the new type of server-interactive rendering.
The reason is that the root App component does not render in user-scope, but rather in some anonymous pre-render scope that you cannot disable. This causes the state container (TokenProvider service) to instantiate once for the App component while a different (user-scoped) instance is created for the consuming component.

Page URL

https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/aspnet/core/blazor/security/server/additional-scenarios?preserve-view=true&view=aspnetcore-8.0#pass-tokens-to-a-server-side-blazor-app

Content source URL

https://github.com/dotnet/AspNetCore.Docs/blob/main/aspnetcore/blazor/security/server/additional-scenarios.md

Document ID

c98be365-408d-7ee6-cb74-14c44d01b0b8

Article author

@guardrex

[github-actions]

💘 Hello, February! Goodbye, New Year's resolutions! 😆

A green dinosaur 🦖 will be along shortly to assist. Stand-by ........

[guardrex]

Hello @kaleidocore ... This is a duplicate of #31691. Although I've pinged engineering for assistance with it, I haven't heard back yet.

I'll take two actions...

1. I'll ping again offline (email) on Monday.
2. I'll research further on my own and report back on the other issue. Keep an 👁️ on it for an update by Monday afternoon EST.

[guardrex]

One more thing ... depending on what ur trying to implement, take a look at our new article and samples for BWAs with OIDC at ...

https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/aspnet/core/blazor/security/server/blazor-web-app-with-oidc?view=aspnetcore-8.0&pivots=without-bff-pattern

[kaleidocore]

@guardrex Thanks for the very quick reply and suggestion! I was actually not trying to implement authentication but rather theming and localization, which are also based on cookies before first render to avoid FOUC. I did however (independently) discover the workaround suggested in the #31691 (comment) in the duplicate post. Sorry for the dupe!