Skip to content

Add CodeQL analysis as CI task #6678

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 25, 2022

Conversation

tautschnig
Copy link
Collaborator

YAML configuration based on GitHub's auto-generated configuration file.

Creating this in Draft mode: I have no idea how useful this might turn out to be.

  • Each commit message has a non-empty body, explaining why the change was made.
  • n/a Methods or procedures I have added are documented, following the guidelines provided in CODING_STANDARD.md.
  • n/a The feature or user visible behaviour I have added or modified has been documented in the User Guide in doc/cprover-manual/
  • Regression or unit tests are included, or existing tests cover the modified code (in this case I have detailed which ones those are in the commit message).
  • n/a My commit message includes data points confirming performance improvements (if claimed).
  • My PR is restricted to a single feature or bugfix.
  • n/a White-space or formatting changes outside the feature-related changed lines are in commits of their own.

@tautschnig tautschnig self-assigned this Feb 17, 2022
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 17, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #6678 (d50f107) into develop (05e1fd6) will increase coverage by 0.03%.
The diff coverage is 86.68%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #6678      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    76.89%   76.92%   +0.03%     
===========================================
  Files         1582     1583       +1     
  Lines       183170   183314     +144     
===========================================
+ Hits        140840   141019     +179     
+ Misses       42330    42295      -35     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
jbmc/src/java_bytecode/lazy_goto_model.cpp 82.17% <0.00%> (ø)
src/ansi-c/expr2c_class.h 100.00% <ø> (ø)
src/crangler/ctokenit.cpp 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
src/crangler/mini_c_parser.cpp 72.67% <0.00%> (ø)
src/goto-checker/solver_factory.h 100.00% <ø> (ø)
src/goto-instrument/reachability_slicer_class.h 100.00% <ø> (ø)
src/goto-programs/goto_trace.h 100.00% <ø> (ø)
src/memory-analyzer/analyze_symbol.cpp 72.98% <0.00%> (ø)
src/symtab2gb/symtab2gb_parse_options.cpp 63.38% <0.00%> (ø)
src/util/exception_utils.cpp 91.66% <0.00%> (-6.12%) ⬇️
... and 32 more

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update dae6c09...d50f107. Read the comment docs.

@tautschnig
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Requires #6682 to be merged first.

YAML configuration based on GitHub's auto-generated configuration file.
@tautschnig tautschnig marked this pull request as ready for review February 24, 2022 23:29
@tautschnig tautschnig requested a review from a team as a code owner February 24, 2022 23:29
@tautschnig
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Making ready for review as CodeQL found one issue (fixed in #6682).

@tautschnig tautschnig merged commit b88797c into diffblue:develop Feb 25, 2022
@tautschnig tautschnig deleted the feature/codeql branch February 25, 2022 12:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants