Skip to content

rw_set: store function identifier alongside instruction reference [blocks: #3126] #3863

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 23, 2019

Conversation

tautschnig
Copy link
Collaborator

We are working towards removing the "function" field from
goto_programt::instructionst::instructiont, and thus need to pass the identifier
of the function whenever it actually is required. rw_set does not yet make use
of this, but will need to once dereferencing is updated to require a function
name.

  • Each commit message has a non-empty body, explaining why the change was made.
  • n/a Methods or procedures I have added are documented, following the guidelines provided in CODING_STANDARD.md.
  • n/a The feature or user visible behaviour I have added or modified has been documented in the User Guide in doc/cprover-manual/
  • Regression or unit tests are included, or existing tests cover the modified code (in this case I have detailed which ones those are in the commit message).
  • n/a My commit message includes data points confirming performance improvements (if claimed).
  • My PR is restricted to a single feature or bugfix.
  • n/a White-space or formatting changes outside the feature-related changed lines are in commits of their own.

Copy link
Contributor

@allredj allredj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

✔️
Passed Diffblue compatibility checks (cbmc commit: 98483ed).
Build URL: https://travis-ci.com/diffblue/test-gen/builds/98004628

We are working towards removing the "function" field from
goto_programt::instructionst::instructiont, and thus need to pass the identifier
of the function whenever it actually is required. rw_set does not yet make use
of this, but will need to once dereferencing is updated to require a function
name.
Copy link
Contributor

@allredj allredj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

✔️
Passed Diffblue compatibility checks (cbmc commit: d939de9).
Build URL: https://travis-ci.com/diffblue/test-gen/builds/98084304

#ifdef LOCAL_MAY
, local_may
,
local_may
#endif
); // NOLINT(whitespace/parens)
if(rw_set.empty())
continue;

symbolt new_symbol;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Unrelated to the purpose of this PR: I guess this should be using util/fresh_symbol.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Certainly true, I'll take a look.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done in #3917.

@peterschrammel peterschrammel removed their assignment Jan 23, 2019
@tautschnig tautschnig merged commit 6fe6e9f into diffblue:develop Jan 23, 2019
@tautschnig tautschnig deleted the function-rw_set branch January 23, 2019 18:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants