-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 277
print disjuncts in Gentzen sequent separately #3164
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
kroening
commented
Oct 14, 2018
- Each commit message has a non-empty body, explaining why the change was made.
- My contribution is formatted in line with CODING_STANDARD.md.
- Methods or procedures I have added are documented, following the guidelines provided in CODING_STANDARD.md.
- Regression or unit tests are included, or existing tests cover the modified code (in this case I have detailed which ones those are in the commit message).
- My commit message includes data points confirming performance improvements (if claimed).
- My PR is restricted to a single feature or bugfix.
- White-space or formatting changes outside the feature-related changed lines are in commits of their own.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
- Why?
- Missing tests.
- This piece of code will require further work once the
function
member is gone frominstructiont
as noted below.
for(const auto &disjunct : disjuncts) | ||
{ | ||
std::string string_value = | ||
from_expr(ns, s_it->source.pc->function, disjunct); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Aren't we removing the function
member?
|
871298a
to
185c912
Compare
Rationale: This avoids a long "{1}" line and matches the usual definition of the Gentzen sequent.
185c912
to
09a7989
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This PR failed Diffblue compatibility checks (cbmc commit: 871298a).
Build URL: https://travis-ci.com/diffblue/test-gen/builds/87887369
Status will be re-evaluated on next push.
Please contact @peterschrammel, @thk123, or @allredj for support.
Common spurious failures:
- the cbmc commit has disappeared in the mean time (e.g. in a force-push)
- the author is not in the list of contributors (e.g. first-time contributors).
The incompatibility may have been introduced by an earlier PR. In that case merging this
PR should be avoided unless it fixes the current incompatibility.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Passed Diffblue compatibility checks (cbmc commit: 09a7989).
Build URL: https://travis-ci.com/diffblue/test-gen/builds/87893119