Skip to content

CBMC does not ignore the is_padding comment on datatype fields #5818

Closed
@danielsn

Description

@danielsn

On a datatype_parameter, the field is marked with the following named sub if its padding

                    "#is_padding": {
                      "id": "1"
                    },

CBMC appears to consider two structs to have different types if they agree on all fields, but disagree on which ones have the #is_padding comments. Aren't comments supposed to be ignored when comparing equality?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions