Ensure evaluating constants

[asashour]

Some rules are missing constant evaluation, e.g. #58470

How about if we have a test, which iterates over all rule tests, and ensures there is a corresponding constant usage for any of 0, 1 and -1?

For example, the following is a test in literal_only_boolean_expressions

if (1 < 0 && true) {} // LINT

The test ensures there is also (which is currently failing)

if (one < zero && true) {} // LINT

Having the FAILING feature would ease adding failing tests, to be fixed at a later stage.

Or would it be too aggressive to do it for all the lints?

[bwilkerson]

I think this would be overkill, so I'm going to close it.