Skip to content

Shard dartdoc_test and remove parallelization constraint on Travis #1910

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 14 commits into from
Jan 24, 2019

Conversation

jcollins-g
Copy link
Contributor

We've greatly improved dartdoc's memory usage profile since the parallelization constraint was added, so remove that. Also begin running tryPublish again, and split dartdoc_test in two as it is taking a very
long time now.

@googlebot googlebot added the cla: yes Google CLA check succeeded. label Jan 23, 2019
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jan 23, 2019

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.02%) to 93.927% when pulling 80c883f on allow-non-writing+shard-integration into 6ec18b5 on master.

@jcollins-g jcollins-g changed the title WIP: Shard dartdoc_test and remove parallelization constraint on Travis Shard dartdoc_test and remove parallelization constraint on Travis Jan 23, 2019
@jcollins-g jcollins-g requested a review from devoncarew January 23, 2019 16:38
@@ -0,0 +1,235 @@
// Copyright (c) 2015, the Dart project authors. Please see the AUTHORS file
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

2019?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

done, and renamed the new library in the library statement

@jcollins-g jcollins-g merged commit 6fac6f7 into master Jan 24, 2019
@jcollins-g jcollins-g deleted the allow-non-writing+shard-integration branch January 24, 2019 17:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cla: yes Google CLA check succeeded.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants