Skip to content

feat: add CODEOWNERS file #301

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 29, 2025
Merged

feat: add CODEOWNERS file #301

merged 1 commit into from
Jun 29, 2025

Conversation

shenxianpeng
Copy link
Collaborator

@shenxianpeng shenxianpeng commented Jun 28, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Added a CODEOWNERS file to automatically assign code review responsibilities to the "@cpp-linter/developers" team for all repository files.

@shenxianpeng shenxianpeng added the enhancement New feature or request label Jun 28, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 28, 2025

Walkthrough

A CODEOWNERS file has been introduced at the root of the repository. This file assigns the "@cpp-linter/developers" team as the code owners for all files, ensuring that any modifications across the repository will require their review or approval.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
.github/CODEOWNERS Added file assigning "@cpp-linter/developers" as owners for all files

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 530737f and d58594f.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/CODEOWNERS (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (1)
.github/CODEOWNERS (1)
Learnt from: 2bndy5
PR: cpp-linter/cpp-linter-action#276
File: action.yml:316-320
Timestamp: 2024-10-18T03:32:24.855Z
Learning: The Unix implementation includes a `case` statement for `CPP_LINTER_COLOR`, so consistency between Unix and Windows implementations is maintained.
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/CODEOWNERS (1)

1-1: CODEOWNERS entry looks correct and will take effect repository-wide

Pattern * properly covers the entire repo, and the file is placed in a supported location (.github/). No further action required.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@shenxianpeng shenxianpeng requested a review from 2bndy5 June 29, 2025 07:34
@shenxianpeng shenxianpeng merged commit fb98c46 into main Jun 29, 2025
6 checks passed
@shenxianpeng shenxianpeng deleted the add-code-owners branch June 29, 2025 16:39
@2bndy5
Copy link
Collaborator

2bndy5 commented Jun 29, 2025

image
image

@shenxianpeng
Copy link
Collaborator Author

It has been fixed once I enable the setting: Enable auto assignment.

Steps to enable: Team -> Settings -> Code reviews -> Enable auto assignment

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants