Remove erroneous two empty line in bootloaders of M0/M0 Pro #455
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Remove erroneous two empty lines in the end as reported by @paul-hoffmann in arduino#263 / arduino#263
Remove erroneous two empty lines in the end as reported by @paul-hoffmann in arduino#263 / arduino#263
…-ending Update Bootloader_D21_M0_150515.hex
…-ending2 Update Bootloader_D21_M0_Pro_150427.hex
cmaglie
approved these changes
Sep 18, 2019
|
@cmaglie Sorry, I used the Github Editor for the quick change and it made it really akward and changed it to single Pull Requests against my own fork - however, due to this, i cannot squash this easily. If you would insist, I would delete this PR and remake it. |
|
NP, I've manually merged into master. Thank you for the PR. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Remove erroneous two empty lines in the end of the M0 and M0-PRO bootloaders as reported by @paul-hoffmann in #263