Skip to content

Conversation

josephperrott
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@josephperrott josephperrott added G This is is related to a Google internal issue target: patch This PR is targeted for the next patch release labels May 22, 2018
@josephperrott josephperrott requested a review from jelbourn as a code owner May 22, 2018 20:51
@googlebot googlebot added the cla: yes PR author has agreed to Google's Contributor License Agreement label May 22, 2018
@mmalerba mmalerba added pr: lgtm action: merge The PR is ready for merge by the caretaker labels May 22, 2018
@ngbot
Copy link

ngbot bot commented May 22, 2018

I see that you just added the pr: merge ready label, but the following checks are still failing:
    failure status "branch manager" is failing
    pending status "ci/circleci: build" is pending
    pending status "continuous-integration/travis-ci/pr" is pending

If you want your PR to be merged, it has to pass all the CI checks.

If you can't get the PR to a green state due to flakes or broken master, please try rebasing to master and/or restarting the CI job. If that fails and you believe that the issue is not due to your change, please contact the caretaker and ask for help.

@josephperrott josephperrott added the blocked This issue is blocked by some external factor, such as a prerequisite PR label May 22, 2018
@mmalerba mmalerba removed the action: merge The PR is ready for merge by the caretaker label May 22, 2018
@ngbot
Copy link

ngbot bot commented Jun 7, 2018

Hi @josephperrott! This PR has merge conflicts due to recent upstream merges.
Please help to unblock it by resolving these conflicts. Thanks!

1 similar comment
@ngbot
Copy link

ngbot bot commented Jun 7, 2018

Hi @josephperrott! This PR has merge conflicts due to recent upstream merges.
Please help to unblock it by resolving these conflicts. Thanks!

@josephperrott josephperrott force-pushed the noop-animation-server branch from 6d1098c to 9567156 Compare June 18, 2018 19:47
@josephperrott josephperrott removed blocked This issue is blocked by some external factor, such as a prerequisite PR pr: lgtm labels Jun 18, 2018
@josephperrott josephperrott requested a review from vikerman June 18, 2018 19:48
@josephperrott josephperrott force-pushed the noop-animation-server branch from 9567156 to 707f497 Compare June 18, 2018 21:38
@josephperrott josephperrott changed the title fix(progress-spinner, progress-bar): Do not prevent animations while SSR fix(progress-spinner): Create internal default to force animations to always be on Jun 18, 2018
@josephperrott josephperrott force-pushed the noop-animation-server branch from 707f497 to 9e79630 Compare June 18, 2018 21:45
@josephperrott josephperrott force-pushed the noop-animation-server branch from 9e79630 to d2554ca Compare June 19, 2018 16:08
Copy link
Member

@jelbourn jelbourn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@jelbourn jelbourn added pr: lgtm action: merge The PR is ready for merge by the caretaker labels Jun 19, 2018
@tinayuangao tinayuangao merged commit d96adbe into angular:master Jun 21, 2018
@josephperrott josephperrott deleted the noop-animation-server branch June 21, 2018 14:28
tinayuangao pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 25, 2018
@angular-automatic-lock-bot
Copy link

This issue has been automatically locked due to inactivity.
Please file a new issue if you are encountering a similar or related problem.

Read more about our automatic conversation locking policy.

This action has been performed automatically by a bot.

@angular-automatic-lock-bot angular-automatic-lock-bot bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 9, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
action: merge The PR is ready for merge by the caretaker cla: yes PR author has agreed to Google's Contributor License Agreement G This is is related to a Google internal issue target: patch This PR is targeted for the next patch release
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants