Skip to content

ci: fix branch comparison #6247

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 15, 2017
Merged

Conversation

filipesilva
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@hansl
Copy link
Contributor

hansl commented May 11, 2017

That environment variable does not exist in Appveyor. There's probably one for that system, or we can disable the commit message test on Appveyor. I'm fine with either.

Copy link
Contributor

@hansl hansl left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

See above

@filipesilva filipesilva force-pushed the fix-commit-test branch 2 times, most recently from 3160448 to cab8b47 Compare May 12, 2017 09:46
@filipesilva
Copy link
Contributor Author

Fixed

@sumitarora sumitarora merged commit ff83b44 into angular:master May 15, 2017
sumitarora pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 15, 2017
@filipesilva filipesilva deleted the fix-commit-test branch May 16, 2017 10:01
sumitarora pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 18, 2017
dond2clouds pushed a commit to d2clouds/speedray-cli that referenced this pull request Apr 23, 2018
@angular-automatic-lock-bot
Copy link

This issue has been automatically locked due to inactivity.
Please file a new issue if you are encountering a similar or related problem.

Read more about our automatic conversation locking policy.

This action has been performed automatically by a bot.

@angular-automatic-lock-bot angular-automatic-lock-bot bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 12, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants