-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
fix: Add a optional grace time period to shutdown method #40
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the quick update! Not sure whether we should add this here, as if
shutdown
is exposed as public API, user can do thetime.sleep
if they need. Do we consider to use async tasks for the worker? https://docs.python.org/3/library/asyncio-task.html.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The current worker use threading. Switch to coroutine may need some work to re-design and implement the retry logic. shutdown() is a public interface suppose to be called before application exit. I have run some tests. Add ether flush or shutdown after tracking will stop the error of
can not schedule future
. Let me ask customer if they added these call.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I see, I thought this fix is for the other issue (timing issue). I cannot reproduce the error
can not schedule future
in both Python 3.9 and 3.10. If adding this can fix the issue, I am good with change. Just to double check, will this be stable with the usage ofsleep
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@bohan-amplitude Can you please first enable py37-p311 pipelines, so we can see what really happens with different python versions, running only on py36 is insane, that version pinned for the fjords long time ago.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi @ssbarnea, just shared open another pull request with workaround for this issue at #43, feel free to take a look and let us know your thoughts. Seems that passes the test on py3.6 to py3.11.