Skip to content

uint32_t instead of int64_t as return type for GetMemorySegmentByteOffset #2432

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 13, 2019
Merged

uint32_t instead of int64_t as return type for GetMemorySegmentByteOffset #2432

merged 2 commits into from
Nov 13, 2019

Conversation

COFFEETALES
Copy link
Contributor

and minor test fixes

Copy link
Member

@tlively tlively left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice! Just a few small readability nits on the test.

@@ -1033,28 +1033,24 @@ void test_for_each() {
assert(BinaryenGetExportByIndex(module, i) == exps[i]);
}

BinaryenAddGlobal(module, "a-global", BinaryenTypeInt32(), 0, makeInt32(module, 125));
const int32_t expected_offsets[] = { 10, 125 };
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
const int32_t expected_offsets[] = { 10, 125 };
const uint32_t expected_offsets[] = { 10, 125 };

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It might be more readable to group all the static data about the segments here at the top instead of mixing it in with binaryen API calls.


const char* segments[] = { "hello, world", "segment data 2" };
int8_t segmentPassive[] = { 0, 0 };
BinaryenExpressionRef segmentOffsets[] = {
BinaryenConst(module, BinaryenLiteralInt32(10)),
BinaryenConst(module, BinaryenLiteralInt32(expected_offsets[0])),
BinaryenGlobalGet(module, "a-global", BinaryenTypeInt32())
};
BinaryenIndex segmentSizes[] = { 12, 14 };
BinaryenSetMemory(module, 1, 256, "mem", segments, segmentPassive, segmentOffsets, segmentSizes, 2, 0);

for (i = 0; i < BinaryenGetNumMemorySegments(module) ; i++) {
char out[15] = {0};
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
char out[15] = {0};
char out[15] = {};

BinaryenGlobalGet(module, "a-global", BinaryenTypeInt32())
};
BinaryenIndex segmentSizes[] = { 12, 14 };
BinaryenSetMemory(module, 1, 256, "mem", segments, segmentPassive, segmentOffsets, segmentSizes, 2, 0);

for (i = 0; i < BinaryenGetNumMemorySegments(module) ; i++) {
char out[15] = {0};
assert(BinaryenGetMemorySegmentByteOffset(module, i) == (0==i?10:125));
assert(BinaryenGetMemorySegmentByteOffset(module, i) == expected_offsets[i]);
assert(BinaryenGetMemorySegmentByteLength(module, i) == segmentSizes[i]);
BinaryenCopyMemorySegmentData(module, i, &out[0]);
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
BinaryenCopyMemorySegmentData(module, i, &out[0]);
BinaryenCopyMemorySegmentData(module, i, out);

else {
assert(0 == strcmp("segment data 2", &out[0]));
}
assert(0 == strcmp(segments[i], &out[0]));
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
assert(0 == strcmp(segments[i], &out[0]));
assert(0 == strcmp(segments[i], out));

Copy link
Member

@tlively tlively left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great, thank you!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants