Skip to content

3.0.4 dev: typo "paramter" #3924

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jun 20, 2024
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions versions/3.0.4.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -1697,7 +1697,7 @@ An `encoding` attribute is introduced to give you control over the serialization
A single encoding definition applied to a single schema property.
See [Appendix B](#dataTypeConversion) for a discussion of converting values of various types to string representations.

Properties are correlated with `multipart` parts using the `name` parameter to `Content-Disposition: form-data`, and with `application/x-www-form-urlencoded` using the query string paramter names.
Properties are correlated with `multipart` parts using the `name` parameter to `Content-Disposition: form-data`, and with `application/x-www-form-urlencoded` using the query string parameter names.
In both cases, their order is implementation-defined.

See [Appendix E](#percentEncodingAndFormMediaTypes) for a detailed examination of percent-encoding concerns for form media types.
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -2326,7 +2326,7 @@ Because of the potential for name clashes, the `operationRef` syntax is preferre
for multi-document OpenAPI descriptions.

Note that it is not possible to provide a constant value to `parameters` that matches the syntax of a runtime expression.
It is possible to have ambiguous parameter names, e.g. `name: id, in: path` and `name: path.id, in: query`; this is NOT RECOMMENDED and the behavior is implementation-defined, however implementations SHOULD prefer the qualified interpretation (`path.id` as a path parameter), as the names can always be qualified to disambiguate them (e.g. using `query.path.id` for the query paramter).
It is possible to have ambiguous parameter names, e.g. `name: id, in: path` and `name: path.id, in: query`; this is NOT RECOMMENDED and the behavior is implementation-defined, however implementations SHOULD prefer the qualified interpretation (`path.id` as a path parameter), as the names can always be qualified to disambiguate them (e.g. using `query.path.id` for the query parameter).

##### Examples

Expand Down