Update ReSpec versions for Arazzo

[ncaidin]

This pull request is automatically triggered by GitHub action respec.

The versions/v*.md files of the Arazzo Specification have changed, so the HTML files are automatically being regenerated.

[handrews]

@frankkilcommins this seems to delete all of the section information in references to RFC3986 which does not seem like a plus. Was that intentional?

[frankkilcommins]

@handrews I was on the fence as to whether to follow the OAS lead and have the RFC link form part of the normative reference table: https://github.com/OAI/OpenAPI-Specification/blob/main/versions/3.1.0.md#relative-references-in-uris

Indeed the section links get lost during the md2html/respec process as covered by #3863

[handrews]

@frankkilcommins I wouldn't assume anything about how the OAS references rendering is done as an intentional thing to follow at the moment. We've discovered a lot of things that are inconsistent or incorrect about it.

[frankkilcommins]

@handrews no worries. I'm working on improving the md2html script on a local branch to handle the situation where fragments are in the RFC links. Works quite well:

so it has the bib link as well as a specific section link

[handrews]

@frankkilcommins that's great- please make sure @Bellangelo is aware of any scripting changes by updating issue #3863!