Skip to content

Test improvements #54

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 5 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

ARF1
Copy link

@ARF1 ARF1 commented Apr 12, 2016

Incorporates rebased #43.
Closes #43.

  • Merge pull request Add Travis-CI #43 from micahcochran/add-travis
  • restore & fix iterShapeRecords() doctest
  • remove test verbosity to make it easier to spot the test failures
  • clean up temp files after running tests
  • add .gitignore & remove databases created by the tests

Travis CI build log.

@ARF1 ARF1 force-pushed the test-improvements branch from bbd28a8 to 43c2e43 Compare April 12, 2016 09:09
@ARF1 ARF1 changed the title Test improvements (incorporates #43) Test improvements Apr 12, 2016
@micahcochran
Copy link
Contributor

Very good.

"All test passed successfully." I like it.

@micahcochran micahcochran mentioned this pull request Apr 12, 2016
@karimbahgat
Copy link
Collaborator

Does anyone know if this has already been incorporated in another PR? If this gets updated to resolve the conflicts I will do my best to merge it right away.

@ARF1
Copy link
Author

ARF1 commented Apr 27, 2017

@karimbahgat Feel free to take ownership of this issue. I keep not being able to find the time to update it.

karimbahgat added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 29, 2017
Default test verbosity to False to make it easier to spot the test failures. Partially fixes #54.
@karimbahgat
Copy link
Collaborator

Great. Seems like most of these have been addressed in some way by previous contributions. Others were incorporated in #95.

Didn't address the test file cleanup, as I am not sure what problems or test errors might come of it. If anyone else is willing to go down this route that's fine too, but for now I'm okay leaving this as is.

Therefore considering this mostly fixed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants