Skip to content

Updates to Uncrustify Formatting #76

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Sep 2, 2023

Conversation

Skptak
Copy link
Member

@Skptak Skptak commented Aug 15, 2023

Splitting up #68 into more manageable single PRs containing just the changes to the individual actions
Will not be doing the YML files one by one, so please reference the #68 actions for proof of working

Relevant test logs can be found here

@kstribrnAmzn
Copy link
Member

Does this not duplicate work from #82?

@Skptak Skptak force-pushed the uncrustifyFormatting branch from 374c07d to 294ee0a Compare August 31, 2023 23:33
…ses. Add a README in, and add in the gitattribute file so the line endings don't get changed
@Skptak Skptak force-pushed the uncrustifyFormatting branch from 294ee0a to 44112c3 Compare August 31, 2023 23:37
@Skptak
Copy link
Member Author

Skptak commented Aug 31, 2023

This is for uncrustify formatting

rawalexe
rawalexe previously approved these changes Sep 1, 2023
…Also use quiet versions of the actions for use in large repos. This keeps the git log smaller so the page doesn't glitch out trying to show you the results
push:
branches: ["**"]
pull_request:
branches: [main,v2]
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

will this branch always exist?

@@ -0,0 +1,100 @@
#include <stdint.h>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this supposed to be named README.md?

Copy link
Contributor

@paulbartell paulbartell left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's not super clear from first glance what each of the test files is verifying. It would be preferable to specify what rules / portion of the style standard are being validated by each test file.

This is better than the current state of this check, so approving it.

@Skptak Skptak merged commit 9460988 into FreeRTOS:main Sep 2, 2023
@Skptak Skptak deleted the uncrustifyFormatting branch September 2, 2023 00:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants