|
| 1 | +.. _github-labels: |
| 2 | + |
| 3 | +Github Labels |
| 4 | +============= |
| 5 | + |
| 6 | +We're using labels on Github to categorize issues and pull requests. |
| 7 | +Many labels are shared for both use cases, while some are dedicated |
| 8 | +only to one. Below is a possibly inexhaustive list, but it should get |
| 9 | +you going. For a full list, see `here <https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/labels>`_. |
| 10 | + |
| 11 | +General purpose labels |
| 12 | +---------------------- |
| 13 | + |
| 14 | +type-behavior |
| 15 | + Used for issues/PRs that address unintentional behavior, but do not |
| 16 | + pose significant security concerns. Generally, bugfixes will be attached |
| 17 | + to a specific issue where the unintended behavior was first reported. |
| 18 | + |
| 19 | +type-documentation |
| 20 | + Used for issues/PRs that exclusively involve changes to |
| 21 | + the documentation. Documentation includes `*.rst` files, docstrings, |
| 22 | + and code comments. |
| 23 | + |
| 24 | +type-enhancement |
| 25 | + Used for issues/PRs that provide additional functionality |
| 26 | + or capabilities beyond the existing specifications. |
| 27 | + |
| 28 | +type-performance |
| 29 | + Used for issues/PRs that provide performance optimizations. |
| 30 | + |
| 31 | +type-security |
| 32 | + Used for issues/PRs that involve critical security issues. Less severe |
| 33 | + security concerns can instead use the type-bugfix label. |
| 34 | + |
| 35 | +type-tests |
| 36 | + Used for issues/PRs that exclusively involve changes to the tests. |
| 37 | + |
| 38 | +OS-Mac / OS-Windows |
| 39 | + Used for issues/PRs involving changes which only have an effect upon |
| 40 | + a specific operating system. |
| 41 | + |
| 42 | +spam |
| 43 | + Used for issues/PRs that don't include enough eggs or bacon. |
| 44 | + |
| 45 | +Labels specific to issues |
| 46 | +------------------------- |
| 47 | + |
| 48 | +Priority |
| 49 | +^^^^^^^^ |
| 50 | + |
| 51 | +release-blocker |
| 52 | + The highest priority of an issue. If unaddressed, will cause the |
| 53 | + release manager to hold releasing a new version of Python. |
| 54 | + |
| 55 | +deferred-blocker |
| 56 | + A release blocker that was pushed one or more releases into the |
| 57 | + future. Possibly a temporary workaround was employed, or the version |
| 58 | + of Python the issue is affecting is still in alpha or beta stages |
| 59 | + of development. |
| 60 | + |
| 61 | +Component |
| 62 | +^^^^^^^^^ |
| 63 | + |
| 64 | +library |
| 65 | + Used for issues involving Python modules in the ``Lib/`` dir. |
| 66 | + |
| 67 | +documentation |
| 68 | + Used for issues involving documentation in the ``Doc/`` dir. |
| 69 | + |
| 70 | +interpreter-core |
| 71 | + Used for issues in interpreter core (``Objects/``, ``Python/``, |
| 72 | + ``Grammar/``, and ``Parser/`` dirs). |
| 73 | + |
| 74 | +extension-modules |
| 75 | + Used for issues involving C modules in the ``Modules/`` dir. |
| 76 | + |
| 77 | +tests |
| 78 | + Used for issues involving only Python's regression test suite, i.e. |
| 79 | + files in the ``Lib/test/`` dir. |
| 80 | + |
| 81 | +Other |
| 82 | +^^^^^ |
| 83 | + |
| 84 | +new |
| 85 | + Denotes that the issue hasn't been looked at by triagers or core |
| 86 | + developers yet. |
| 87 | + |
| 88 | +easy |
| 89 | + Denotes that the issue is a good candidate for a newcomer to address. |
| 90 | + |
| 91 | + |
| 92 | +Labels specific to PRs |
| 93 | +---------------------- |
| 94 | + |
| 95 | +DO-NOT-MERGE |
| 96 | + Used on PRs to prevent miss-islington from being able |
| 97 | + to automatically merge the pull request. This label is appropriate when a PR |
| 98 | + has a non-trivial conflict with the branch it is being merged into. |
| 99 | + |
| 100 | +expert-asyncio |
| 101 | + Used for PRs which involve changes to the asyncio module |
| 102 | + or other asynchronous frameworks that utilize it. |
| 103 | + |
| 104 | +invalid |
| 105 | + Used manually for PRs that do not meet basic requirements and |
| 106 | + automatically added by bedevere when PR authors attempt to merge maintenace |
| 107 | + branches into the main branch. During events such as the October |
| 108 | + Hacktoberfest, this label will prevent the PR from counting toward the |
| 109 | + author's contributions. |
| 110 | + |
| 111 | +needs backport to X.Y |
| 112 | + Used for PRs which are appropriate to backport to |
| 113 | + branches prior to main. Generally, backports to the maintenance branches |
| 114 | + are primarily bugfixes and documentation clarifications. Backports to the |
| 115 | + security branches are strictly reserved for PRs involving security fixes, such as |
| 116 | + crashes, privilege escalation, and DoS. The use of this label will cause |
| 117 | + miss-islington to attempt to automatically merge the PR into the branches |
| 118 | + specified. |
| 119 | + |
| 120 | +skip issue |
| 121 | + Used for PRs which involve trivial changes, such as typo fixes, |
| 122 | + comment changes, and section rephrases. The majority of PRs require |
| 123 | + an issue to be attached to, but if there are no code changes and the |
| 124 | + section being modified retains the same meaning, this label might be |
| 125 | + appropriate. |
| 126 | + |
| 127 | +skip news |
| 128 | + Similar to the skip issue label, this label is used for PRs which |
| 129 | + involve trivial changes, backports, or already have a relevant news entry |
| 130 | + in another PR. Any potentially impactful changes should have a |
| 131 | + corresponding news entry, but for trivial changes it's commonly at the |
| 132 | + discretion of the PR author if they wish to opt-out of making one. |
| 133 | + |
| 134 | +sprint |
| 135 | + Used for PRs authored during an in-person sprint, such as |
| 136 | + at PyCon, EuroPython, or other official Python events. The label is |
| 137 | + used to prioritize the review of those PRs during the sprint. |
| 138 | + |
| 139 | +stale |
| 140 | + Used for PRs that include changes which are no longer relevant, or when the |
| 141 | + author hasn't responded to feedback in a long period of time, or when the |
| 142 | + reviewer is unresponsive. This label helps core developers quickly identify |
| 143 | + PRs that are candidates for closure or require a ping to the author or |
| 144 | + reviewer. |
| 145 | + |
| 146 | +awaiting review |
| 147 | + Used for PRs that haven't been reviewed by anyone yet. |
| 148 | + |
| 149 | +awaiting core review |
| 150 | + Used when the PR is authored by a core developer or when a non-core |
| 151 | + developer has reviewed the PR, even if they requested changes. |
| 152 | + Note that reviewers could have been added manually by a triager or core |
| 153 | + developer, or included automatically through use of the `CODEOWNERS |
| 154 | + <https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/main/.github/CODEOWNERS>`_ |
| 155 | + file. |
| 156 | + |
| 157 | +awaiting changes |
| 158 | + A reviewer required changes to proceed with the PR. |
| 159 | + |
| 160 | +awaiting change review |
| 161 | + The PR author made requested changes, and they are waiting for review. |
| 162 | + |
| 163 | +awaiting merge |
| 164 | + The PR has been approved by a core developer and is ready to merge. |
| 165 | + |
| 166 | +test-with-buildbots |
| 167 | + Used on PRs to test the latest commit with the buildbot fleet. Generally for |
| 168 | + PRs with large code changes requiring more testing before merging. This |
| 169 | + may take multiple hours to complete. Triagers can also stop a stuck build |
| 170 | + using the web interface. |
0 commit comments