Skip to content

fix: Fixed interface parameter transmission not displaying during deb… #2969

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 24, 2025
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
5 changes: 4 additions & 1 deletion ui/src/components/ai-chat/index.vue
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -162,7 +162,10 @@ const initialApiFormData = ref({})
const isUserInput = computed(
() =>
props.applicationDetails.work_flow?.nodes?.filter((v: any) => v.id === 'base-node')[0]
.properties.user_input_field_list.length > 0
.properties.user_input_field_list.length > 0 ||
(props.type === 'debug-ai-chat' &&
props.applicationDetails.work_flow?.nodes?.filter((v: any) => v.id === 'base-node')[0]
.properties.api_input_field_list.length > 0)
)
const showUserInputContent = computed(() => {
return ((isUserInput.value && firsUserInput.value) || showUserInput.value) && props.type !== 'log'
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There are no significant irregularities or major issues in this代码. However, here are a few points to consider:

  1. Type of v: The line inside .filter() is using type assertion (any), which can lead to runtime errors if not handled properly. It's better to specify the TypeScript types more explicitly.

  2. Complexity with Logical OR: The last part of the logical OR condition checks for different properties based on the application type (type). If these conditions become too complex and nested multiple times, they might make the logic harder to read.

  3. Variable Naming: Variables like firstUserInput should be defined before being used to avoid potential undefined variable usage errors during computation.

  4. **Computed Property Name`: While it seems fine at first glance, ensure that dynamic computed property names will work as expected across different environments, especially if you plan to use this in frameworks that support template interpolation or other reactive contexts heavily relying on computed properties.

Overall, the code looks functional, but improving its efficiency through better typing could enhance maintainability and prevent future bugs related to invalid data processing.

Expand Down