"generalized rdf datasets" => "generalized RDF Datasets"

Author: gkellogg

index.html

@@ -9187,7 +9187,7 @@ <h2>Relationship to RDF</h2>
   </ul>
 
   <p class="issue atrisk">The use of <a>blank node identifiers</a> to label properties is obsolete,
-    and may be removed in a future version of JSON-LD, as is the support for <a>generalized rdf datasets</a>.</p>
+    and may be removed in a future version of JSON-LD, as is the support for <a>generalized RDF Datasets</a>.</p>
 
   <p>Summarized, these differences mean that JSON-LD is capable of serializing any RDF
     <a>graph</a> or <a>dataset</a> and most, but not all, JSON-LD documents can be directly
@@ -9886,7 +9886,7 @@ <h2>Changes since JSON-LD Community Group Final Report</h2>
       also allows a term to be defined for <code>@type</code>, where the value MUST be a <a>dictionary</a>
       with <code>@container</code> set to <code>@set</code>.</li>
     <li>The use of <a>blank node identifiers</a> to label properties is obsolete,
-      and may be removed in a future version of JSON-LD, as is the support for <a>generalized rdf datasets</a>.</li>
+      and may be removed in a future version of JSON-LD, as is the support for <a>generalized RDF Datasets</a>.</li>
   </ul>
 </section>