@@ -1100,8 +1100,19 @@ Consider the following class definition:
11001100----
11011101====
11021102
1103- When the preceding POJO is defined as a bean in a Spring IoC container, you can make the bean instance
1104- transactional by adding only one line of XML configuration:
1103+ Used at the class level as above, the annotation indicates a default for all methods
1104+ of the declaring class (as well as its subclasses). Alternatively, each method can
1105+ get annotated individually. Note that a class-level annotation does not apply to
1106+ ancestor classes up the class hierarchy; in such a scenario, methods need to be
1107+ locally redeclared in order to participate in a subclass-level annotation.
1108+
1109+ When a POJO class such as the one above is defined as a bean in a Spring context,
1110+ you can make the bean instance transactional through an `@EnableTransactionManagement`
1111+ annotation in a `@Configuration` class. See the
1112+ {api-spring-framework}/transaction/annotation/EnableTransactionManagement.html[javadoc]
1113+ for full details.
1114+
1115+ In XML configuration, the `<tx:annotation-driven/>` tag provides similar convenience:
11051116
11061117====
11071118[source,xml,indent=0]
@@ -1126,6 +1137,7 @@ transactional by adding only one line of XML configuration:
11261137
11271138 <!-- enable the configuration of transactional behavior based on annotations -->
11281139 <tx:annotation-driven transaction-manager="txManager"/><!-- a PlatformTransactionManager is still required --> <1>
1140+
11291141 <bean id="txManager" class="org.springframework.jdbc.datasource.DataSourceTransactionManager">
11301142 <!-- (this dependency is defined somewhere else) -->
11311143 <property name="dataSource" ref="dataSource"/>
@@ -1144,11 +1156,6 @@ if the bean name of the `PlatformTransactionManager` that you want to wire in ha
11441156dependency-inject has any other name, you have to use the `transaction-manager` attribute,
11451157as in the preceding example.
11461158
1147- NOTE: If you use Java-based configuration, the `@EnableTransactionManagement` annotation
1148- provides equivalent support . You can add the annotation to a `@Configuration` class.
1149- See the {api-spring-framework}/transaction/annotation/EnableTransactionManagement.html[javadoc]
1150- for full details.
1151-
11521159.Method visibility and `@Transactional`
11531160****
11541161When you use proxies, you should apply the `@Transactional` annotation only to methods
@@ -1158,13 +1165,13 @@ method does not exhibit the configured transactional settings. If you need to an
11581165non-public methods, consider using AspectJ (described later).
11591166****
11601167
1161- You can place the `@Transactional` annotation before an interface definition, a method
1168+ You can apply the `@Transactional` annotation to an interface definition, a method
11621169on an interface, a class definition, or a public method on a class. However, the
11631170mere presence of the `@Transactional` annotation is not enough to activate the
1164- transactional behavior. The `@Transactional` annotation is merely metadata that can be
1165- consumed by some runtime infrastructure that is `@Transactional`-aware and that can use
1166- the metadata to configure the appropriate beans with transactional behavior. In the
1167- preceding example, the `<tx:annotation-driven/>` element switches on the
1171+ transactional behavior. The `@Transactional` annotation is merely metadata that can
1172+ be consumed by some runtime infrastructure that is `@Transactional`-aware and that
1173+ can use the metadata to configure the appropriate beans with transactional behavior.
1174+ In the preceding example, the `<tx:annotation-driven/>` element switches on the
11681175transactional behavior.
11691176
11701177TIP: The Spring team recommends that you annotate only concrete classes (and methods of
@@ -1173,9 +1180,8 @@ You certainly can place the `@Transactional` annotation on an interface (or an i
11731180method), but this works only as you would expect it to if you use interface-based
11741181proxies. The fact that Java annotations are not inherited from interfaces means that,
11751182if you use class-based proxies (`proxy-target-class="true"`) or the weaving-based
1176- aspect (`mode="aspectj"`), the transaction settings are not recognized by the
1177- proxying and weaving infrastructure, and the object is not wrapped in a
1178- transactional proxy, which would be decidedly bad.
1183+ aspect (`mode="aspectj"`), the transaction settings are not recognized by the proxying
1184+ and weaving infrastructure, and the object is not wrapped in a transactional proxy.
11791185
11801186NOTE: In proxy mode (which is the default), only external method calls coming in through
11811187the proxy are intercepted. This means that self-invocation (in effect, a method within
0 commit comments