-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15
feat: Function to adjust SBD Session Timeout #23
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
371f614
to
0d5d68b
Compare
Rebased on main HEAD |
Converting to draft, it only works if called after begin(), so I think this has to be tracked as a variable... |
b496c43
to
d34a52c
Compare
Ready for review, tried to reduce the impact as much as possible. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is looking good Andrew (@ndoo ),
Please have a think about adding the changes suggested below.
I can't see any potential problems. And it maintains backwards compatibility. Thanks!
I don't know what would happen if the user called this while a SBDIX was already in progress? But that's a very fringe case...
Signed-off-by: Andrew Yong <[email protected]>
d34a52c
to
68c112d
Compare
Force pushed with requested changes + minor code style change for the if statement (curly brace on new line) |
I think this is not possible to call during SBDIX with the current library as AFAICT there is no async functionality, so SBDIX is blocking. |
Thank you for the updates Andrew (@ndoo ), I will let this sit for a few days, just in case you want to add or change anything. Please give me a nudge if I have not merged it by this time next week. Best wishes, |
Sounds good to me. It'll give us some time to let our code cycle through a bunch of Tx cycles too. If I notice any regressions or ill effects I'll likewise communicate here. Cheers. |
Independent of existing code, but open to suggestions/feedback.