Skip to content

REPO NO LONGER MAINTAINED - USE LINKED FORK INSTEAD - STOP LOGGING ISSUES #181

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
shyal opened this issue Sep 24, 2019 · 4 comments
Open

Comments

@shyal
Copy link

shyal commented Sep 24, 2019

Thanks @yishanhe for finding a good and maintained fork:

Really appreciate that @skygragon contributed such a great tool.
But since it is not got maintained for more than half year.
I drilled down the fork network and found https://github.com/leetcode-tools/leetcode-cli is
very active and is maintained by the @jdneo who is the author of vscode-leetcode.
Maybe it is time to move on. But it is always better if we can avoid divergence.

#173

@skygragon
Copy link
Owner

@shyal sorry for my reply lately... the truth is, I got a new job last year and honestly it does cost all my energy and time due to the well-known 996 pressure...
However I'm glad you guys like @jdneo are helping around during my absence. Also I'm thinking of a better way to keep this project more active/responsive. I guess friends here are students mostly or working guys that seeking a job, eventually they will have new focus and move on. While I'd like to keep this project alive forever, and sincerely welcome more maintainers to make this happen.

@jdneo
Copy link
Contributor

jdneo commented Sep 29, 2019

Echo for @skygragon. So far I was just making some workaround to the leetcode-cli in the fork. But it's not recommended to take that fork as a final solution. I'm still hoping the vscode-leetcode can directly use the original cli to provide features to the users.

It will be great if anyone is volunteer to be a maintainer for this great project.

@shyal
Copy link
Author

shyal commented Sep 29, 2019

@skygragon great to hear from you. My suggestion is to designate a team of maintainers to evaluate and approve pull requests. In my case, i've fixed issues in my branch that already have pull requests that were never merged.

It's totally understandable that you're busy with your job. My guess is this repo will remain is good health if some maintainers are allowed to merge into it.

@peterschussheim
Copy link

Can we close this issue or at least modify the title so it is not so misleading?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants