Skip to content

scalaz.zio cross compilation dotty errors #6149

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
fkowal opened this issue Mar 22, 2019 · 6 comments
Closed

scalaz.zio cross compilation dotty errors #6149

fkowal opened this issue Mar 22, 2019 · 6 comments
Labels
itype:meta Issues about process/similar

Comments

@fkowal
Copy link

fkowal commented Mar 22, 2019

When adding dotty 0.13.0-RC1 as scalaVersion in zio/zio#674
I ran in to a few "regressions" compared to 2.12.8

I am not sure how to report all of them.
Please have a look at the commit history, you can reproduce them by running:

sbt ++0.13.0-RC1 coreJVM/test:compile

@smarter
Copy link
Member

smarter commented Mar 23, 2019

I am not sure how to report all of them.

For each issue, try to find the minimum amount of code required to reproduce it (try to get it down to one file, and then it's easy to just remove code from that file piece by piece to get something minimal). If this proves too cumbersome, then an issue which points to a single git commit that clearly shows the problem is also acceptable, but it'll take us much longer to fix it.

@abgruszecki
Copy link
Contributor

@fkowal let me just add that all problems you mentioned are important issues for us to fix and you minimising them would be very helpful!

@smarter smarter added the itype:meta Issues about process/similar label Mar 26, 2019
@fkowal
Copy link
Author

fkowal commented Mar 26, 2019

I’ll be sure to try and narrow down the source of these errors. Two of them have already their own issues opened. So 3 more to go

@VladKopanev
Copy link

I have created a ticket that is related to type inference and also was encountered during scalaz.zio compilation with dotty, please take look #6199

@liufengyun
Copy link
Contributor

It seems all bugs reported are fixed in the master branch.

@fkowal Could you please check if it indeed works? Thanks.

@OlivierBlanvillain
Copy link
Contributor

Closing this for now, feel free to open new issues as needed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
itype:meta Issues about process/similar
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants