You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This idea came to my mind while opening my 19th tab for searching a implementation of the trait in my current crate I was working with, here is basically what I thought.
let's say you have a crate metrics, this crate has a amazing trait named Layer<R> and with some method present inside of it.
now let's say I wish to discover crates which implement this trait on it self, therefore instead of manually scrounging docs.rs maybe we have a tiny little button which helps us do that, directly from the page of the crate itself, in my understanding this can save redundant tab spawning as well.
Let me know what you guys think.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
artech-git
changed the title
Support for discovering cross crate implementation of a Trait for other types in the foreign crates.
Support for discovering cross crate implementation of a Trait for types present in a foreign crates.
Mar 1, 2024
Hi @syphar my initial idea & #1467 are pretty close, what I think would be amazing to have if it can indexed on the docs.rs server itself and also to show a distinct filtering regarding whether the crate who are implementing this have it implemented internally or is it public in on the object types of the crate.
This idea came to my mind while opening my 19th tab for searching a implementation of the trait in my current crate I was working with, here is basically what I thought.
let's say you have a crate
metrics
, this crate has a amazing trait namedLayer<R>
and with some method present inside of it.now let's say I wish to discover crates which implement this trait on it self, therefore instead of manually scrounging docs.rs maybe we have a tiny little button which helps us do that, directly from the page of the crate itself, in my understanding this can save redundant tab spawning as well.
Let me know what you guys think.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: