Skip to content

Conversation

@cwoolum
Copy link
Contributor

@cwoolum cwoolum commented Jun 6, 2024

What is it?

  • Feature / enhancement
  • Bug
  • Docs / tests
  • Other

Why is it needed?

Chromium 109-113 did not properly support the popover but reported that they did. This led to the polyfill not activating which caused our E2E tests to break. We are dropping down to Chromium 108 to validate the polyfill as users of Chrome would see it before the popover API was supported.

Checklist:

  • My code follows the developer guidelines of this project
  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have ran pnpm change and documented my changes
  • I have add necessary docs (if needed)
  • Added new tests to cover the fix / functionality

@changeset-bot
Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Jun 6, 2024

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: bc14491

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 1 package
Name Type
@qwik-ui/headless Patch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@pkg-pr-new
Copy link

pkg-pr-new bot commented Jun 6, 2024

Review PR in StackBlitz Codeflow Run & review this pull request in StackBlitz Codeflow.

@qwik-ui/headless (bc14491)

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/qwikifiers/qwik-ui/@qwik-ui/headless@827

null

Copy link
Collaborator

@thejackshelton thejackshelton left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! 🙌

Merging

Side note: @cwoolum I think you can use .toHaveCSS instead of the .evalute method from playwright

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants