FIx various typos

Found via `codespell -q 3 -S ./mypyc/external/googletest -L alo,ans,asend,ba,bre,dne,fo,haa,ist,larg,myu,nams,spawnve,statics,thow,ure,wont`

Author: luzpaz

docs/source/error_code_list.rst

@@ -545,7 +545,7 @@ Check instantiation of abstract classes [abstract]
 --------------------------------------------------
 
 Mypy generates an error if you try to instantiate an abstract base
-class (ABC). An abtract base class is a class with at least one
+class (ABC). An abstract base class is a class with at least one
 abstract method or attribute. (See also :py:mod:`abc` module documentation)
 
 Sometimes a class is made accidentally abstract, often due to an

docs/source/extending_mypy.rst

@@ -246,7 +246,7 @@ when the configuration for a module changes, we want to invalidate
 mypy's cache for that module so that it can be rechecked. This hook
 should be used to report to mypy any relevant configuration data,
 so that mypy knows to recheck the module if the configuration changes.
-The hooks hould return data encodable as JSON.
+The hooks should return data encodable as JSON.
 
 Notes about the semantic analyzer
 *********************************

mypy/checker.py

@@ -2558,7 +2558,7 @@ def check_final(self,
                 name = lv.node.name
                 cls = self.scope.active_class()
                 if cls is not None:
-                    # Theses additional checks exist to give more error messages
+                    # These additional checks exist to give more error messages
                     # even if the final attribute was overridden with a new symbol
                     # (which is itself an error)...
                     for base in cls.mro[1:]:

mypy/main.py

@@ -1010,7 +1010,7 @@ def set_strict_flags() -> None:
         process_cache_map(parser, special_opts, options)
 
     # An explicitly specified cache_fine_grained implies local_partial_types
-    # (because otherwise the cache is not compatiable with dmypy)
+    # (because otherwise the cache is not compatible with dmypy)
     if options.cache_fine_grained:
         options.local_partial_types = True
 

mypy/plugins/dataclasses.py

@@ -217,7 +217,7 @@ def add_slots(self,
             )
             return
         if info.slots is not None or info.names.get('__slots__'):
-            # This means we have a slots confict.
+            # This means we have a slots conflict.
             # Class explicitly specifies `__slots__` field.
             # And `@dataclass(slots=True)` is used.
             # In runtime this raises a type error.

mypy/plugins/singledispatch.py

@@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ def singledispatch_register_callback(ctx: MethodContext) -> Type:
     # TODO: check that there's only one argument
     first_arg_type = get_proper_type(get_first_arg(ctx.arg_types))
     if isinstance(first_arg_type, (CallableType, Overloaded)) and first_arg_type.is_type_obj():
-        # HACK: We receieved a class as an argument to register. We need to be able
+        # HACK: We received a class as an argument to register. We need to be able
         # to access the function that register is being applied to, and the typeshed definition
         # of register has it return a generic Callable, so we create a new
         # SingleDispatchRegisterCallable class, define a __call__ method, and then add a

mypy/semanal_main.py

@@ -249,7 +249,7 @@ def process_top_level_function(analyzer: 'SemanticAnalyzer',
     """Analyze single top-level function or method.
 
     Process the body of the function (including nested functions) again and again,
-    until all names have been resolved (ot iteration limit reached).
+    until all names have been resolved (or iteration limit reached).
     """
     # We need one more iteration after incomplete is False (e.g. to report errors, if any).
     final_iteration = False

mypy/server/update.py

@@ -1077,7 +1077,7 @@ def not_found() -> None:
         # A ClassDef target covers the body of the class and everything defined
         # within it.  To get the body we include the entire surrounding target,
         # typically a module top-level, since we don't support processing class
-        # bodies as separate entitites for simplicity.
+        # bodies as separate entities for simplicity.
         assert file is not None
         if node.fullname != target:
             # This is a reference to a different TypeInfo, likely due to a stale dependency.

mypy/typeshed/stdlib/@python2/__builtin__.pyi

@@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ class type(object):
     def __new__(cls, name: str, bases: Tuple[type, ...], namespace: Dict[str, Any]) -> type: ...
     def __call__(self, *args: Any, **kwds: Any) -> Any: ...
     def __subclasses__(self: _TT) -> List[_TT]: ...
-    # Note: the documentation doesnt specify what the return type is, the standard
+    # Note: the documentation doesn't specify what the return type is, the standard
     # implementation seems to be returning a list.
     def mro(self) -> List[type]: ...
     def __instancecheck__(self, instance: Any) -> bool: ...

mypy/typeshed/stdlib/@python2/builtins.pyi

@@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ class type(object):
     def __new__(cls, name: str, bases: Tuple[type, ...], namespace: Dict[str, Any]) -> type: ...
     def __call__(self, *args: Any, **kwds: Any) -> Any: ...
     def __subclasses__(self: _TT) -> List[_TT]: ...
-    # Note: the documentation doesnt specify what the return type is, the standard
+    # Note: the documentation doesn't specify what the return type is, the standard
     # implementation seems to be returning a list.
     def mro(self) -> List[type]: ...
     def __instancecheck__(self, instance: Any) -> bool: ...

mypy/typeshed/stdlib/builtins.pyi

@@ -153,7 +153,7 @@ class type(object):
     def __new__(cls: Type[_TT], name: str, bases: Tuple[type, ...], namespace: dict[str, Any], **kwds: Any) -> _TT: ...
     def __call__(self, *args: Any, **kwds: Any) -> Any: ...
     def __subclasses__(self: _TT) -> list[_TT]: ...
-    # Note: the documentation doesnt specify what the return type is, the standard
+    # Note: the documentation doesn't specify what the return type is, the standard
     # implementation seems to be returning a list.
     def mro(self) -> list[type]: ...
     def __instancecheck__(self, instance: Any) -> bool: ...

mypy/typeshed/stdlib/multiprocessing/__init__.pyi

@@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ _SemaphoreType = synchronize.Semaphore
 # multiprocessing.context.BaseContext's methods, so the two signatures should
 # be identical (modulo self).
 
-# Sychronization primitives
+# Synchronization primitives
 _LockLike = Union[synchronize.Lock, synchronize.RLock]
 RawValue = context._default_context.RawValue
 RawArray = context._default_context.RawArray

mypy/typeshed/stdlib/os/__init__.pyi

@@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ class PathLike(Protocol[_AnyStr_co]):
 _FdOrAnyPath = Union[int, StrOrBytesPath]
 
 class DirEntry(Generic[AnyStr]):
-    # This is what the scandir interator yields
+    # This is what the scandir iterator yields
     # The constructor is hidden
 
     name: AnyStr

mypy/typeshed/stdlib/tkinter/__init__.pyi

@@ -730,7 +730,7 @@ class Pack:
     forget = pack_forget
     propagate = Misc.pack_propagate
     # commented out to avoid mypy getting confused with multiple
-    # inheritance and how things get overrided with different things
+    # inheritance and how things get overridden with different things
     # info = pack_info
     # pack_propagate = Misc.pack_propagate
     # configure = pack_configure
@@ -774,7 +774,7 @@ class Place:
     place = place_configure
     info = place_info
     # commented out to avoid mypy getting confused with multiple
-    # inheritance and how things get overrided with different things
+    # inheritance and how things get overridden with different things
     # config = place_configure
     # configure = place_configure
     # forget = place_forget
@@ -816,7 +816,7 @@ class Grid:
     location = Misc.grid_location
     size = Misc.grid_size
     # commented out to avoid mypy getting confused with multiple
-    # inheritance and how things get overrided with different things
+    # inheritance and how things get overridden with different things
     # bbox = Misc.grid_bbox
     # grid_bbox = Misc.grid_bbox
     # forget = grid_forget
@@ -2960,7 +2960,7 @@ class OptionMenu(Menubutton):
         command: Callable[[StringVar], Any] | None = ...,
     ) -> None: ...
     # configure, config, cget are inherited from Menubutton
-    # destroy and __getitem__ are overrided, signature does not change
+    # destroy and __getitem__ are overridden, signature does not change
 
 class _Image(Protocol):
     tk: _tkinter.TkappType

mypy/typeshed/stdlib/tkinter/ttk.pyi

@@ -1122,7 +1122,7 @@ class LabeledScale(Frame):
         compound: Literal["top"] | Literal["bottom"] = ...,
         **kw: Any,
     ) -> None: ...
-    # destroy is overrided, signature does not change
+    # destroy is overridden, signature does not change
     value: Any
 
 class OptionMenu(Menubutton):
@@ -1138,5 +1138,5 @@ class OptionMenu(Menubutton):
         command: Callable[[tkinter.StringVar], Any] | None = ...,
     ) -> None: ...
     # configure, config, cget, destroy are inherited from Menubutton
-    # destroy and __setitem__ are overrided, signature does not change
+    # destroy and __setitem__ are overridden, signature does not change
     def set_menu(self, default: Any | None = ..., *values): ...

test-data/stdlib-samples/3.2/shutil.py

@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ class ReadError(EnvironmentError):
     """Raised when an archive cannot be read"""
 
 class RegistryError(Exception):
-    """Raised when a registery operation with the archiving
+    """Raised when a registry operation with the archiving
     and unpacking registeries fails"""
 
 
@@ -676,7 +676,7 @@ def register_unpack_format(name: str, extensions: List[str], function: Any,
     _UNPACK_FORMATS[name] = extensions, function, extra_args, description
 
 def unregister_unpack_format(name: str) -> None:
-    """Removes the pack format from the registery."""
+    """Removes the pack format from the registry."""
     del _UNPACK_FORMATS[name]
 
 def _ensure_directory(path: str) -> None:

test-data/unit/hacks.txt

@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ y = ''  # This could be valid if a new 'y' is defined here
 ```
 
 Note that some of the checks may turn out to be redundant, as the
-exact rules for what constitues a redefinition are still up for
+exact rules for what constitutes a redefinition are still up for
 debate. This is okay since the extra if statements generally don't
 otherwise affect semantics.