You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
What's the problem this feature will solve?
Currently, the classifiers allow to declare a software licensed under "BSD License".
Other frameworks like SPDX offers BSD-2-Clause and BSD-3-Clause, the two most used "BSD" licenses.
This ambiguity have impact to automated external tools: I've uploaded a package licensed under BSD-2-Clause, and external service libraries.io offers to generate a machine-readable properties file offering license_spdx: BSD-3-Clause.
What's the problem this feature will solve?
Currently, the classifiers allow to declare a software licensed under "BSD License".
Other frameworks like SPDX offers BSD-2-Clause and BSD-3-Clause, the two most used "BSD" licenses.
This ambiguity have impact to automated external tools: I've uploaded a package licensed under BSD-2-Clause, and external service libraries.io offers to generate a machine-readable properties file offering
license_spdx: BSD-3-Clause
.Describe the solution you'd like
Additional context
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BSD_licenses#Terms details the different n-Clause
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: