-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
Comparison with isal #13
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
Hi @danielhrisca , sorry for my late reply. I hadn't yet turned on notifications for this repository. (I have now). You could install the latest development version to see if it makes any difference. On my machine, isal still beats zlib-ng when reading, but the result is much more close. Writing isal easily wins, but it only has low compression levels. So zlib-ng is certainly worth considering when higher compression levels are desired. |
|
I opened #15 to update to 2.1.4 It would be nice to get a new release with it |
The latest release now has the latest zlib-ng bundled. |
@danielhrisca I have run some benchmarks, tables below. The conclusions:
Does this adequately answer your question? Python-isal
python-zlib-ng
|
I will close this issue as I am cleaning up all issues that do not require further action. Feel free to reopen when something new comes up! |
Hello Ruben,
the latest beta release of zlib NG https://github.com/zlib-ng/zlib-ng/releases/tag/2.1.0-beta1 promises some big speed improvements
Is there a way to compare it against python-isal?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: