-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
New weather module? #2129
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
Just an idea: does |
Using Just my thoughts... |
To me, atmosphere is related to the 11 km column of aerosols above us, e.g., quantities such as airmass and precipitable water vapor. This seems in line with the current module title "Airmass and atmospheric models". Therefore, I would not expect to find, functions concerning near-ground weather in this module, thus I'm still leaning towards a new PLEASE SHARE YOUR OPINION @pvlib/pvlib-core, @echedey-ls, @RDaxini, @IoannisSifnaios, others |
I'm not fond of the name |
I'm not strongly in favour or against. Creation of new modules seems a bit too ad hoc in general, so perhaps I would lean toward using atmosphere mainly because it avoids that. I also have no problem with the wind speed functions being in the temperature module because that's what they're used for in pv modeling |
Here's UCAR's definition of weather:
I think that fits well with the |
I prefer
|
As always I'm thrilled that we have such a great community that's willing to give different perspectives on ideas, pushing pvlib to be greater than any one of us could achieve - thanks @adriesse, @wholmgren, @kandersolar, @cwhanse, @RDaxini! @IoannisSifnaios let's proceed with adding the wind speed function in #2124 to the atmosphere module |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
#2124 is adding a new function to estimate wind speed at different heights. In the PR there's a discussion about whether adding a new
wind
module makes sense given that we aren't sure there'll ever be more wind functions. @cwhanse brought up the idea of adding it to the temperature module (#2124 (comment)). Personally, I don't think adding it to the temperature module is a great fit either, as this would change the scope of this module significantly.Therefore, as a compromise, I suggest creating a new module named
weather
, that can host functions related to, you guessed it, weather (e.g., humidity, wind speed, pressure). Thetemperature
module can then be reserved for functions related specifically to module temperature, which I think was its original purpose (the documentation title is "PV temperature models").A potential new weather module would also be a great fit for #1744. Last, I could easily imagine other weather-related models being added in the future (and we avoid having modules named humidity, wind, pressure, etc.).
@IoannisSifnaios, @RDaxini
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: