Skip to content

Add a test for admin operations #309

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
hug-dev opened this issue Jan 8, 2021 · 0 comments · Fixed by #318
Closed

Add a test for admin operations #309

hug-dev opened this issue Jan 8, 2021 · 0 comments · Fixed by #318
Labels
multitenancy Getting Parsec to provide isolated key stores for multiple clients based on an identity mechanism security Issues related to the security and privacy of the service

Comments

@hug-dev
Copy link
Member

hug-dev commented Jan 8, 2021

After ListClients is implemented and the admin features (#308), this should be tested.

We could use the multitenancy test and use one of the two clients as an admin. The admin one must execute ListClients successfully while the other one should fail with the appropriate error. This for all authenticators supported. The infrasctruture is almost already there for that, expect that ListClients will have to be implemented first.

@hug-dev hug-dev added security Issues related to the security and privacy of the service multitenancy Getting Parsec to provide isolated key stores for multiple clients based on an identity mechanism labels Jan 8, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
multitenancy Getting Parsec to provide isolated key stores for multiple clients based on an identity mechanism security Issues related to the security and privacy of the service
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant