docs(NODE-5961): aggregate projection example 1 #4040
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
aditi-khare-mongoDB
changed the title
nbbeeken
added
the
Primary Review
nbbeeken
suggested changes
Mar 15, 2024
test/integration/node-specific/examples/project_fields_from_query_results.test.js
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
test/integration/node-specific/examples/project_fields_from_query_results.test.js
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
nbbeeken
approved these changes
Mar 15, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Add example test case for Aggregate Projection to docs.
What is changing?
Example being added to the documentation for aggregate projections.
Is there new documentation needed for these changes?
Yes, this example will be added under the Node.js tab on the Project Fields to Return from Query Results under Aggregate Projection
What is the motivation for this change?
Documentation team request.
Double check the following
npm run check:lintscripttype(NODE-xxxx)[!]: descriptionfeat(NODE-1234)!: rewriting everything in coffeescript