From 1f784ff714a1cd640fe3718213bd5ec15da3a53f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Steve Koch Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2013 21:06:30 -0600 Subject: [PATCH] Update product-catalog.txt sheesh ... minor typo ... i think i corrected? "query was were" -> "queries were" --- source/use-cases/product-catalog.txt | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/source/use-cases/product-catalog.txt b/source/use-cases/product-catalog.txt index d4d8f5b4bcd..545d98d70b4 100644 --- a/source/use-cases/product-catalog.txt +++ b/source/use-cases/product-catalog.txt @@ -478,7 +478,7 @@ key is difficult to predict without information about your database's actual activity and distribution. Consider that: - ``details.issue_date`` would be a poor addition to the shard key - because, although it appears in a number of queries, no query was + because, although it appears in a number of queries, no queries were *selective* by this field. - you should include one or more fields in the ``detail`` document