Skip to content

[Issue] Reduce TierPriceManagement class complexity by quick refactor #29477

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
4 tasks
m2-assistant bot opened this issue Aug 11, 2020 · 2 comments · Fixed by #29202
Closed
4 tasks

[Issue] Reduce TierPriceManagement class complexity by quick refactor #29477

m2-assistant bot opened this issue Aug 11, 2020 · 2 comments · Fixed by #29202
Assignees
Labels
Component: Catalog Fixed in 2.4.x The issue has been fixed in 2.4-develop branch Issue: Confirmed Gate 3 Passed. Manual verification of the issue completed. Issue is confirmed Issue: Format is valid Gate 1 Passed. Automatic verification of issue format passed Issue: Ready for Work Gate 4. Acknowledged. Issue is added to backlog and ready for development Priority: P3 May be fixed according to the position in the backlog. Reproduced on 2.4.x The issue has been reproduced on latest 2.4-develop branch Severity: S3 Affects non-critical data or functionality and does not force users to employ a workaround. Triage: Dev.Experience Issue related to Developer Experience and needs help with Triage to Confirm or Reject it

Comments

@m2-assistant
Copy link

m2-assistant bot commented Aug 11, 2020

This issue is automatically created based on existing pull request: #29202: Reduce TierPriceManagement class complexity by quick refactor


Preconditions (*)

I had to debug the issue of removing Tier price. I found the class complex and code style rather poor.
That is why I extracted some repeated code to separate private methods with singular responsibility and explicit types.

Related Pull Requests

Fixed Issues (if relevant)

  1. Fixes magento/magento2#<issue_number>

Steps to reproduce (*)

  1. ...
  2. ...

Actual Result:

Expected Result:

Questions or comments

Contribution checklist (*)

  • Pull request has a meaningful description of its purpose
  • All commits are accompanied by meaningful commit messages
  • All new or changed code is covered with unit/integration tests (if applicable)
  • All automated tests passed successfully (all builds are green)
@ghost ghost assigned lbajsarowicz Aug 11, 2020
@magento-engcom-team magento-engcom-team added the Issue: Format is not valid Gate 1 Failed. Automatic verification of issue format is failed label Aug 11, 2020
@sdzhepa sdzhepa added the Triage: Dev.Experience Issue related to Developer Experience and needs help with Triage to Confirm or Reject it label Aug 11, 2020
@sidolov sidolov added Priority: P3 May be fixed according to the position in the backlog. Severity: S3 Affects non-critical data or functionality and does not force users to employ a workaround. labels Aug 13, 2020
@magento-engcom-team magento-engcom-team added Issue: Format is valid Gate 1 Passed. Automatic verification of issue format passed and removed Issue: Format is not valid Gate 1 Failed. Automatic verification of issue format is failed labels Aug 14, 2020
@engcom-Alfa engcom-Alfa added Issue: Confirmed Gate 3 Passed. Manual verification of the issue completed. Issue is confirmed Reproduced on 2.4.x The issue has been reproduced on latest 2.4-develop branch labels Aug 14, 2020
@ghost ghost removed the Triage: Dev.Experience Issue related to Developer Experience and needs help with Triage to Confirm or Reject it label Aug 14, 2020
@magento-engcom-team magento-engcom-team added the Issue: Ready for Work Gate 4. Acknowledged. Issue is added to backlog and ready for development label Aug 14, 2020
@magento-engcom-team
Copy link
Contributor

✅ Confirmed by @engcom-Alfa
Thank you for verifying the issue. Based on the provided information internal tickets MC-36738 were created

Issue Available: @engcom-Alfa, You will be automatically unassigned. Contributors/Maintainers can claim this issue to continue. To reclaim and continue work, reassign the ticket to yourself.

@engcom-Alfa engcom-Alfa added the Triage: Dev.Experience Issue related to Developer Experience and needs help with Triage to Confirm or Reject it label Aug 14, 2020
@magento-engcom-team
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @m2-assistant[bot]. Thank you for your report.
The issue has been fixed in #29202 by @lbajsarowicz in 2.4-develop branch
Related commit(s):

The fix will be available with the upcoming 2.4.1 release.

@magento-engcom-team magento-engcom-team added the Fixed in 2.4.x The issue has been fixed in 2.4-develop branch label Aug 15, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Component: Catalog Fixed in 2.4.x The issue has been fixed in 2.4-develop branch Issue: Confirmed Gate 3 Passed. Manual verification of the issue completed. Issue is confirmed Issue: Format is valid Gate 1 Passed. Automatic verification of issue format passed Issue: Ready for Work Gate 4. Acknowledged. Issue is added to backlog and ready for development Priority: P3 May be fixed according to the position in the backlog. Reproduced on 2.4.x The issue has been reproduced on latest 2.4-develop branch Severity: S3 Affects non-critical data or functionality and does not force users to employ a workaround. Triage: Dev.Experience Issue related to Developer Experience and needs help with Triage to Confirm or Reject it
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

5 participants