Skip to content

Feature request: expose getOpcode through Python bindings #85549

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
sergiunagy opened this issue Mar 16, 2024 · 3 comments
Closed

Feature request: expose getOpcode through Python bindings #85549

sergiunagy opened this issue Mar 16, 2024 · 3 comments
Labels
clang:as-a-library libclang and C++ API enhancement Improving things as opposed to bug fixing, e.g. new or missing feature

Comments

@sergiunagy
Copy link

Hello,

I'm using clang and the Python bindings to perform some automated code analysis .
I ran into the issue where I cannot differentiate between the different Binary Operations using just the available bindings.
I am working on creating a custom binding for this but an exposed binding in the clang package would be cleaner (and probably more efficient).

@Endilll Endilll added enhancement Improving things as opposed to bug fixing, e.g. new or missing feature clang:as-a-library libclang and C++ API and removed new issue labels Jul 28, 2024
@Endilll
Copy link
Contributor

Endilll commented Jul 28, 2024

CC @DeinAlptraum can you take a look at this, too?

@DeinAlptraum
Copy link
Contributor

Isn't this resolved through #98489?

@Endilll
Copy link
Contributor

Endilll commented Jul 29, 2024

Indeed, thank you!
This should be available in Clang 19. Feel free to reopen if that's not the case.

@Endilll Endilll closed this as completed Jul 29, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
clang:as-a-library libclang and C++ API enhancement Improving things as opposed to bug fixing, e.g. new or missing feature
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants