You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It is not correct to lower "x<<32-y>>32-y" to "bfe x, 0, y". When y
equals to 32, the left-hand side is still x (unchanged), however, the
right-hand side will be evaluated to 0. So it is not always correct to
do such transformation.
We may be able to keep the pattern for immediate y while y is within [0,
31]. However, the immediate operands of the sub (32 - y) are easily
folded, and "(x << imm) >> imm" will be lowered to "and x,
(2^(32-imm))-1" anyway. So no bfe matching is needed.
0 commit comments