[X86] Don't convert local function foo in the same section to foo(%rip) when the offset is near INT32_MIN

```
define internal void @foo() {
  ret void
}
define i64 @main() {
  ret i64 add (i64 ptrtoint (ptr @foo to i64), i64 -2147483626)
}
```

When `foo` is a local symbol, `foo` and `main` are in the same section,
and `offset` is near INT32_MIN, referencing `foo+offset` in `main` with
RIP-relative addressing needs `leaq .text+offset1(%rip), %rax` where
`offset1 < offset`, and `offset1` might underflow.
(https://discourse.llvm.org/t/arithmetic-referencing-dso-local-function-causes-compilation-error-on-linux-x64/80033):

Don't use RIP-relative addressing if the negative offset is near
INT32_MIN. Arbitrarily reuse the magic number in isOffsetSuitableForCodeModel to
guard against the edge case when `address(current_instruction)-foo < 4GiB-16MiB`.
If the difference is larger than 4GiB-16MiB, `ret i64 add (i64 ptrtoint
(ptr @foo to i64), i64 -2**32+256MiB)` would still cause the assembly
issue, such cases are unrealistic.

Pull Request: #98438

Author: MaskRay

llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelDAGToDAG.cpp

@@ -1975,6 +1975,16 @@ bool X86DAGToDAGISel::matchAddress(SDValue N, X86ISelAddressMode &AM) {
       AM.Scale == 1 && AM.BaseType == X86ISelAddressMode::RegBase &&
       AM.Base_Reg.getNode() == nullptr && AM.IndexReg.getNode() == nullptr &&
       AM.SymbolFlags == X86II::MO_NO_FLAG && AM.hasSymbolicDisplacement()) {
+    // However, when GV is a local function symbol and in the same section as
+    // the current instruction, and AM.Disp is negative and near INT32_MIN,
+    // referencing GV+Disp generates a relocation referencing the section symbol
+    // with an even smaller offset, which might underflow. We should bail out if
+    // the negative offset is too close to INT32_MIN. Actually, we are more
+    // conservative here, using a smaller magic number also used by
+    // isOffsetSuitableForCodeModel.
+    if (isa_and_nonnull<Function>(AM.GV) && AM.Disp < -16 * 1024 * 1024)
+      return true;
+
     AM.Base_Reg = CurDAG->getRegister(X86::RIP, MVT::i64);
   }
 

llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/fold-add.ll

@@ -180,4 +180,71 @@ entry:
   ret i64 add (i64 ptrtoint (ptr @foo to i64), i64 -2147483649)
 }
 
+define internal void @bar() #0 {
+; STATIC-LABEL: bar:
+; STATIC:       # %bb.0:
+; STATIC-NEXT:    retq
+;
+; PIC-LABEL: bar:
+; PIC:       # %bb.0:
+; PIC-NEXT:    retq
+;
+; MSTATIC-LABEL: bar:
+; MSTATIC:       # %bb.0:
+; MSTATIC-NEXT:    retq
+;
+; MPIC-LABEL: bar:
+; MPIC:       # %bb.0:
+; MPIC-NEXT:    retq
+  ret void
+}
+
+define dso_local i64 @fun_neg_0xfeffffff() #0 {
+; STATIC-LABEL: fun_neg_0xfeffffff:
+; STATIC:       # %bb.0:
+; STATIC-NEXT:    movl $bar, %eax
+; STATIC-NEXT:    addq $-16777217, %rax # imm = 0xFEFFFFFF
+; STATIC-NEXT:    retq
+;
+; PIC-LABEL: fun_neg_0xfeffffff:
+; PIC:       # %bb.0:
+; PIC-NEXT:    leaq bar-16777217(%rip), %rax
+; PIC-NEXT:    retq
+;
+; MSTATIC-LABEL: fun_neg_0xfeffffff:
+; MSTATIC:       # %bb.0:
+; MSTATIC-NEXT:    movl $bar, %eax
+; MSTATIC-NEXT:    addq $-16777217, %rax # imm = 0xFEFFFFFF
+; MSTATIC-NEXT:    retq
+;
+; MPIC-LABEL: fun_neg_0xfeffffff:
+; MPIC:       # %bb.0:
+; MPIC-NEXT:    leaq bar-16777217(%rip), %rax
+; MPIC-NEXT:    retq
+  ret i64 add (i64 ptrtoint (ptr @bar to i64), i64 -16777217)
+}
+
+define dso_local i64 @fun_neg_ff000000() #0 {
+; STATIC-LABEL: fun_neg_ff000000:
+; STATIC:       # %bb.0:
+; STATIC-NEXT:    leaq bar-16777216(%rip), %rax
+; STATIC-NEXT:    retq
+;
+; PIC-LABEL: fun_neg_ff000000:
+; PIC:       # %bb.0:
+; PIC-NEXT:    leaq bar-16777216(%rip), %rax
+; PIC-NEXT:    retq
+;
+; MSTATIC-LABEL: fun_neg_ff000000:
+; MSTATIC:       # %bb.0:
+; MSTATIC-NEXT:    leaq bar-16777216(%rip), %rax
+; MSTATIC-NEXT:    retq
+;
+; MPIC-LABEL: fun_neg_ff000000:
+; MPIC:       # %bb.0:
+; MPIC-NEXT:    leaq bar-16777216(%rip), %rax
+; MPIC-NEXT:    retq
+  ret i64 add (i64 ptrtoint (ptr @bar to i64), i64 -16777216)
+}
+
 attributes #0 = { nounwind }