@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ use ln::channel::{COMMITMENT_TX_BASE_WEIGHT, COMMITMENT_TX_WEIGHT_PER_HTLC};
22
22
use ln::channelmanager::{ChannelManager, ChannelManagerReadArgs, RAACommitmentOrder, PaymentSendFailure, BREAKDOWN_TIMEOUT, MIN_CLTV_EXPIRY_DELTA};
23
23
use ln::channel::{Channel, ChannelError};
24
24
use ln::{chan_utils, onion_utils};
25
+ use ln::chan_utils::HTLC_SUCCESS_TX_WEIGHT;
25
26
use routing::router::{Route, RouteHop, RouteHint, RouteHintHop, get_route};
26
27
use routing::network_graph::RoutingFees;
27
28
use ln::features::{ChannelFeatures, InitFeatures, InvoiceFeatures, NodeFeatures};
@@ -1700,14 +1701,24 @@ fn test_chan_reserve_violation_outbound_htlc_inbound_chan() {
1700
1701
// sending any above-dust amount would result in a channel reserve violation.
1701
1702
// In this test we check that we would be prevented from sending an HTLC in
1702
1703
// this situation.
1703
- chanmon_cfgs[ 0 ] . fee_estimator = test_utils:: TestFeeEstimator { sat_per_kw : Mutex :: new ( 6000 ) } ;
1704
- chanmon_cfgs[ 1 ] . fee_estimator = test_utils:: TestFeeEstimator { sat_per_kw : Mutex :: new ( 6000 ) } ;
1704
+ let feerate_per_kw = 253;
1705
+ chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator = test_utils::TestFeeEstimator { sat_per_kw: Mutex::new(feerate_per_kw) };
1706
+ chanmon_cfgs[1].fee_estimator = test_utils::TestFeeEstimator { sat_per_kw: Mutex::new(feerate_per_kw) };
1705
1707
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
1706
1708
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
1707
1709
let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
1708
- let _ = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value ( & nodes, 0 , 1 , 100000 , 95000000 , InitFeatures :: known ( ) , InitFeatures :: known ( ) ) ;
1709
1710
1710
- let ( route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash ! ( nodes[ 1 ] , nodes[ 0 ] , 4843000 ) ;
1711
+ let mut push_amt = 100_000_000;
1712
+ push_amt -= feerate_per_kw as u64 * (COMMITMENT_TX_BASE_WEIGHT + COMMITMENT_TX_WEIGHT_PER_HTLC) / 1000 * 1000;
1713
+ push_amt -= Channel::<EnforcingSigner>::get_holder_selected_channel_reserve_satoshis(100_000) * 1000;
1714
+
1715
+ let _ = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100_000, push_amt, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
1716
+
1717
+ // Sending exactly enough to hit the reserve amount should be accepted
1718
+ let (_, _, _) = route_payment(&nodes[1], &[&nodes[0]], 1_000_000);
1719
+
1720
+ // However one more HTLC should be significantly over the reserve amount and fail.
1721
+ let (route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[1], nodes[0], 1_000_000);
1711
1722
unwrap_send_err!(nodes[1].node.send_payment(&route, our_payment_hash, &Some(our_payment_secret)), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { ref err },
1712
1723
assert_eq!(err, "Cannot send value that would put counterparty balance under holder-announced channel reserve value"));
1713
1724
assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
@@ -1759,21 +1770,34 @@ fn test_chan_reserve_violation_inbound_htlc_outbound_channel() {
1759
1770
fn test_chan_reserve_dust_inbound_htlcs_outbound_chan() {
1760
1771
// Test that if we receive many dust HTLCs over an outbound channel, they don't count when
1761
1772
// calculating our commitment transaction fee (this was previously broken).
1762
- let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs ( 2 ) ;
1773
+ let mut chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
1774
+ let feerate_per_kw = 253;
1775
+ chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator = test_utils::TestFeeEstimator { sat_per_kw: Mutex::new(feerate_per_kw) };
1776
+ chanmon_cfgs[1].fee_estimator = test_utils::TestFeeEstimator { sat_per_kw: Mutex::new(feerate_per_kw) };
1777
+
1763
1778
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
1764
1779
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None]);
1765
1780
let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
1766
1781
1767
1782
// Set nodes[0]'s balance such that they will consider any above-dust received HTLC to be a
1768
1783
// channel reserve violation (so their balance is channel reserve (1000 sats) + commitment
1769
1784
// transaction fee with 0 HTLCs (183 sats)).
1770
- create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value ( & nodes, 0 , 1 , 100000 , 98817000 , InitFeatures :: known ( ) , InitFeatures :: known ( ) ) ;
1785
+ let mut push_amt = 100_000_000;
1786
+ push_amt -= feerate_per_kw as u64 * (COMMITMENT_TX_BASE_WEIGHT) / 1000 * 1000;
1787
+ push_amt -= Channel::<EnforcingSigner>::get_holder_selected_channel_reserve_satoshis(100_000) * 1000;
1788
+ create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100000, push_amt, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
1771
1789
1772
- let dust_amt = 329000 ; // Dust amount
1790
+ let dust_amt = crate::ln::channel::MIN_DUST_LIMIT_SATOSHIS * 1000
1791
+ + feerate_per_kw as u64 * HTLC_SUCCESS_TX_WEIGHT / 1000 * 1000 - 1;
1773
1792
// In the previous code, routing this dust payment would cause nodes[0] to perceive a channel
1774
1793
// reserve violation even though it's a dust HTLC and therefore shouldn't count towards the
1775
1794
// commitment transaction fee.
1776
1795
let (_, _, _) = route_payment(&nodes[1], &[&nodes[0]], dust_amt);
1796
+
1797
+ // One more than the dust amt should fail, however.
1798
+ let (route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[1], nodes[0], dust_amt + 1);
1799
+ unwrap_send_err!(nodes[1].node.send_payment(&route, our_payment_hash, &Some(our_payment_secret)), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { ref err },
1800
+ assert_eq!(err, "Cannot send value that would put counterparty balance under holder-announced channel reserve value"));
1777
1801
}
1778
1802
1779
1803
#[test]
0 commit comments