Skip to content

Commit d37b1dd

Browse files
authored
Merge pull request #998 from TheBlueMatt/2021-07-fix-chan-reserve-msat-sat
Fix channel reserve calculation on the sending side
2 parents 99ecd02 + 306e9a5 commit d37b1dd

File tree

3 files changed

+33
-8
lines changed

3 files changed

+33
-8
lines changed

fuzz/src/chanmon_consistency.rs

Lines changed: 1 addition & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -241,6 +241,7 @@ fn check_api_err(api_err: APIError) {
241241
_ if err.starts_with("Cannot push more than their max accepted HTLCs ") => {},
242242
_ if err.starts_with("Cannot send value that would put us over the max HTLC value in flight our peer will accept ") => {},
243243
_ if err.starts_with("Cannot send value that would put our balance under counterparty-announced channel reserve value") => {},
244+
_ if err.starts_with("Cannot send value that would put counterparty balance under holder-announced channel reserve value") => {},
244245
_ if err.starts_with("Cannot send value that would overdraw remaining funds.") => {},
245246
_ if err.starts_with("Cannot send value that would not leave enough to pay for fees.") => {},
246247
_ => panic!("{}", err),

lightning/src/ln/channel.rs

Lines changed: 1 addition & 1 deletion
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -4087,7 +4087,7 @@ impl<Signer: Sign> Channel<Signer> {
40874087
if !self.is_outbound() {
40884088
// Check that we won't violate the remote channel reserve by adding this HTLC.
40894089
let counterparty_balance_msat = self.channel_value_satoshis * 1000 - self.value_to_self_msat;
4090-
let holder_selected_chan_reserve_msat = Channel::<Signer>::get_holder_selected_channel_reserve_satoshis(self.channel_value_satoshis);
4090+
let holder_selected_chan_reserve_msat = Channel::<Signer>::get_holder_selected_channel_reserve_satoshis(self.channel_value_satoshis) * 1000;
40914091
let htlc_candidate = HTLCCandidate::new(amount_msat, HTLCInitiator::LocalOffered);
40924092
let counterparty_commit_tx_fee_msat = self.next_remote_commit_tx_fee_msat(htlc_candidate, None);
40934093
if counterparty_balance_msat < holder_selected_chan_reserve_msat + counterparty_commit_tx_fee_msat {

lightning/src/ln/functional_tests.rs

Lines changed: 31 additions & 7 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ use ln::channel::{COMMITMENT_TX_BASE_WEIGHT, COMMITMENT_TX_WEIGHT_PER_HTLC};
2222
use ln::channelmanager::{ChannelManager, ChannelManagerReadArgs, RAACommitmentOrder, PaymentSendFailure, BREAKDOWN_TIMEOUT, MIN_CLTV_EXPIRY_DELTA};
2323
use ln::channel::{Channel, ChannelError};
2424
use ln::{chan_utils, onion_utils};
25+
use ln::chan_utils::HTLC_SUCCESS_TX_WEIGHT;
2526
use routing::router::{Route, RouteHop, RouteHint, RouteHintHop, get_route};
2627
use routing::network_graph::RoutingFees;
2728
use ln::features::{ChannelFeatures, InitFeatures, InvoiceFeatures, NodeFeatures};
@@ -1700,14 +1701,24 @@ fn test_chan_reserve_violation_outbound_htlc_inbound_chan() {
17001701
// sending any above-dust amount would result in a channel reserve violation.
17011702
// In this test we check that we would be prevented from sending an HTLC in
17021703
// this situation.
1703-
chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator = test_utils::TestFeeEstimator { sat_per_kw: Mutex::new(6000) };
1704-
chanmon_cfgs[1].fee_estimator = test_utils::TestFeeEstimator { sat_per_kw: Mutex::new(6000) };
1704+
let feerate_per_kw = 253;
1705+
chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator = test_utils::TestFeeEstimator { sat_per_kw: Mutex::new(feerate_per_kw) };
1706+
chanmon_cfgs[1].fee_estimator = test_utils::TestFeeEstimator { sat_per_kw: Mutex::new(feerate_per_kw) };
17051707
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
17061708
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
17071709
let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
1708-
let _ = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100000, 95000000, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
17091710

1710-
let (route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[1], nodes[0], 4843000);
1711+
let mut push_amt = 100_000_000;
1712+
push_amt -= feerate_per_kw as u64 * (COMMITMENT_TX_BASE_WEIGHT + COMMITMENT_TX_WEIGHT_PER_HTLC) / 1000 * 1000;
1713+
push_amt -= Channel::<EnforcingSigner>::get_holder_selected_channel_reserve_satoshis(100_000) * 1000;
1714+
1715+
let _ = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100_000, push_amt, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
1716+
1717+
// Sending exactly enough to hit the reserve amount should be accepted
1718+
let (_, _, _) = route_payment(&nodes[1], &[&nodes[0]], 1_000_000);
1719+
1720+
// However one more HTLC should be significantly over the reserve amount and fail.
1721+
let (route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[1], nodes[0], 1_000_000);
17111722
unwrap_send_err!(nodes[1].node.send_payment(&route, our_payment_hash, &Some(our_payment_secret)), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { ref err },
17121723
assert_eq!(err, "Cannot send value that would put counterparty balance under holder-announced channel reserve value"));
17131724
assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
@@ -1759,21 +1770,34 @@ fn test_chan_reserve_violation_inbound_htlc_outbound_channel() {
17591770
fn test_chan_reserve_dust_inbound_htlcs_outbound_chan() {
17601771
// Test that if we receive many dust HTLCs over an outbound channel, they don't count when
17611772
// calculating our commitment transaction fee (this was previously broken).
1762-
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
1773+
let mut chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
1774+
let feerate_per_kw = 253;
1775+
chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator = test_utils::TestFeeEstimator { sat_per_kw: Mutex::new(feerate_per_kw) };
1776+
chanmon_cfgs[1].fee_estimator = test_utils::TestFeeEstimator { sat_per_kw: Mutex::new(feerate_per_kw) };
1777+
17631778
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
17641779
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None]);
17651780
let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
17661781

17671782
// Set nodes[0]'s balance such that they will consider any above-dust received HTLC to be a
17681783
// channel reserve violation (so their balance is channel reserve (1000 sats) + commitment
17691784
// transaction fee with 0 HTLCs (183 sats)).
1770-
create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100000, 98817000, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
1785+
let mut push_amt = 100_000_000;
1786+
push_amt -= feerate_per_kw as u64 * (COMMITMENT_TX_BASE_WEIGHT) / 1000 * 1000;
1787+
push_amt -= Channel::<EnforcingSigner>::get_holder_selected_channel_reserve_satoshis(100_000) * 1000;
1788+
create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100000, push_amt, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
17711789

1772-
let dust_amt = 329000; // Dust amount
1790+
let dust_amt = crate::ln::channel::MIN_DUST_LIMIT_SATOSHIS * 1000
1791+
+ feerate_per_kw as u64 * HTLC_SUCCESS_TX_WEIGHT / 1000 * 1000 - 1;
17731792
// In the previous code, routing this dust payment would cause nodes[0] to perceive a channel
17741793
// reserve violation even though it's a dust HTLC and therefore shouldn't count towards the
17751794
// commitment transaction fee.
17761795
let (_, _, _) = route_payment(&nodes[1], &[&nodes[0]], dust_amt);
1796+
1797+
// One more than the dust amt should fail, however.
1798+
let (route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[1], nodes[0], dust_amt + 1);
1799+
unwrap_send_err!(nodes[1].node.send_payment(&route, our_payment_hash, &Some(our_payment_secret)), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { ref err },
1800+
assert_eq!(err, "Cannot send value that would put counterparty balance under holder-announced channel reserve value"));
17771801
}
17781802

17791803
#[test]

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)