Skip to content

Commit 46464a3

Browse files
committed
Add a test for the ordering setting in channel_reestablish handling
1 parent 70c8f68 commit 46464a3

File tree

2 files changed

+123
-0
lines changed

2 files changed

+123
-0
lines changed

src/ln/chanmon_update_fail_tests.rs

Lines changed: 117 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -1098,3 +1098,120 @@ fn raa_no_response_awaiting_raa_state() {
10981098
claim_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], payment_preimage_2);
10991099
claim_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], payment_preimage_3);
11001100
}
1101+
1102+
#[test]
1103+
fn claim_while_disconnected_monitor_update_fail() {
1104+
// Test for claiming a payment while disconnected and then having the resulting
1105+
// channel-update-generated monitor update fail. This kind of thing isn't a particularly
1106+
// contrived case for nodes with network instability.
1107+
// Backported from chanmon_fail_consistency fuzz tests as an unmerged version of the handling
1108+
// code introduced a regression in this test (specifically, this caught a removal of the
1109+
// channel_reestablish handling ensuring the order was sensical given the messages used).
1110+
let mut nodes = create_network(2);
1111+
create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
1112+
1113+
// Forward a payment for B to claim
1114+
let (payment_preimage_1, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 1000000);
1115+
1116+
nodes[0].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), false);
1117+
nodes[1].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), false);
1118+
1119+
assert!(nodes[1].node.claim_funds(payment_preimage_1));
1120+
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
1121+
1122+
nodes[0].node.peer_connected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
1123+
nodes[1].node.peer_connected(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
1124+
1125+
let as_reconnect = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendChannelReestablish, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
1126+
let bs_reconnect = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendChannelReestablish, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
1127+
1128+
nodes[0].node.handle_channel_reestablish(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_reconnect).unwrap();
1129+
assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
1130+
1131+
// Now deliver a's reestablish, freeing the claim from the holding cell, but fail the monitor
1132+
// update.
1133+
*nodes[1].chan_monitor.update_ret.lock().unwrap() = Err(ChannelMonitorUpdateErr::TemporaryFailure);
1134+
1135+
if let msgs::HandleError { err, action: Some(msgs::ErrorAction::IgnoreError) } = nodes[1].node.handle_channel_reestablish(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_reconnect).unwrap_err() {
1136+
assert_eq!(err, "Failed to update ChannelMonitor");
1137+
} else { panic!(); }
1138+
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
1139+
assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
1140+
1141+
// Send a second payment from A to B, resulting in a commitment update that gets swallowed with
1142+
// the monitor still failed
1143+
let route = nodes[0].router.get_route(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), None, &Vec::new(), 1000000, TEST_FINAL_CLTV).unwrap();
1144+
let (payment_preimage_2, payment_hash_2) = get_payment_preimage_hash!(nodes[0]);
1145+
nodes[0].node.send_payment(route, payment_hash_2).unwrap();
1146+
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
1147+
1148+
let as_updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
1149+
nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_updates.update_add_htlcs[0]).unwrap();
1150+
if let msgs::HandleError { err, action: Some(msgs::ErrorAction::IgnoreError) } = nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_updates.commitment_signed).unwrap_err() {
1151+
assert_eq!(err, "Previous monitor update failure prevented generation of RAA");
1152+
} else { panic!(); }
1153+
// Note that nodes[1] not updating monitor here is OK - it wont take action on the new HTLC
1154+
// until we've test_restore_channel_monitor'd and updated for the new commitment transaction.
1155+
1156+
// Now un-fail the monitor, which will result in B sending its original commitment update,
1157+
// receiving the commitment update from A, and the resulting commitment dances.
1158+
*nodes[1].chan_monitor.update_ret.lock().unwrap() = Ok(());
1159+
nodes[1].node.test_restore_channel_monitor();
1160+
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
1161+
1162+
let bs_msgs = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
1163+
assert_eq!(bs_msgs.len(), 2);
1164+
1165+
match bs_msgs[0] {
1166+
MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { ref node_id, ref updates } => {
1167+
assert_eq!(*node_id, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
1168+
nodes[0].node.handle_update_fulfill_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &updates.update_fulfill_htlcs[0]).unwrap();
1169+
nodes[0].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &updates.commitment_signed).unwrap();
1170+
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
1171+
1172+
let as_raa = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
1173+
nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_raa).unwrap();
1174+
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
1175+
},
1176+
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
1177+
}
1178+
1179+
match bs_msgs[1] {
1180+
MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK { ref node_id, ref msg } => {
1181+
assert_eq!(*node_id, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
1182+
nodes[0].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), msg).unwrap();
1183+
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
1184+
},
1185+
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
1186+
}
1187+
1188+
let as_commitment = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
1189+
1190+
let bs_commitment = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
1191+
nodes[0].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_commitment.commitment_signed).unwrap();
1192+
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
1193+
let as_raa = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
1194+
1195+
nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_commitment.commitment_signed).unwrap();
1196+
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
1197+
let bs_raa = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
1198+
nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_raa).unwrap();
1199+
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
1200+
1201+
expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]);
1202+
expect_payment_received!(nodes[1], payment_hash_2);
1203+
1204+
nodes[0].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_raa).unwrap();
1205+
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
1206+
1207+
let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
1208+
assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
1209+
match events[0] {
1210+
Event::PaymentSent { ref payment_preimage } => {
1211+
assert_eq!(*payment_preimage, payment_preimage_1);
1212+
},
1213+
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
1214+
}
1215+
1216+
claim_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], payment_preimage_2);
1217+
}

src/ln/channelmanager.rs

Lines changed: 6 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -471,6 +471,12 @@ macro_rules! return_monitor_err {
471471
return Err(MsgHandleErrInternal::from_finish_shutdown("ChannelMonitor storage failure", channel_id, chan.force_shutdown(), $self.get_channel_update(&chan).ok()))
472472
},
473473
ChannelMonitorUpdateErr::TemporaryFailure => {
474+
if !$resend_commitment {
475+
debug_assert!($action_type == RAACommitmentOrder::RevokeAndACKFirst || !$resend_raa);
476+
}
477+
if !$resend_raa {
478+
debug_assert!($action_type == RAACommitmentOrder::CommitmentFirst || !$resend_commitment);
479+
}
474480
$entry.get_mut().monitor_update_failed($action_type, $resend_raa, $resend_commitment, $failed_forwards, $failed_fails);
475481
return Err(MsgHandleErrInternal::from_chan_no_close(ChannelError::Ignore("Failed to update ChannelMonitor"), *$entry.key()));
476482
},

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)