Skip to content

Hyper-schema basic test plan #203

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
handrews opened this issue Nov 19, 2017 · 5 comments
Closed

Hyper-schema basic test plan #203

handrews opened this issue Nov 19, 2017 · 5 comments
Assignees
Labels
documentation A request for new or updated documentation for the suite

Comments

@handrews
Copy link
Contributor

To get the hyper-schema work started, I plan to write a markdown file outlining the test cases. This will probably be done through multiple commits.

@handrews handrews added documentation A request for new or updated documentation for the suite draft support labels Nov 19, 2017
@handrews handrews self-assigned this Nov 19, 2017
@Julian
Copy link
Member

Julian commented Nov 19, 2017

I think I still don't follow what it even means to test the hyper schema, but definitely looking forward to seeing what you have in mind!

@handrews
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Julian the new examples section shows actual input and and output expectations.

@handrews
Copy link
Contributor Author

See also the newly added output schema which is recommended rather than required, but it's what I'll build the test suite around.

@Julian
Copy link
Member

Julian commented Nov 19, 2017

Nice, will have a look, thanks.

@Julian
Copy link
Member

Julian commented Jun 17, 2022

Going to close this until hyper-schema is actively worked on again so there's something actionable to do here, but when that day comes, 100% agree we should add things for it.

@Julian Julian closed this as completed Jun 17, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation A request for new or updated documentation for the suite
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants