Skip to content

Conversation

@jfmengels
Copy link
Collaborator

Add no-absolute-path rule (fixes #530)

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Aug 30, 2016

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.03%) to 97.757% when pulling b7d454c on no-absolute-path into 28dbed8 on master.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Aug 30, 2016

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.03%) to 97.757% when pulling b7d454c on no-absolute-path into 28dbed8 on master.

describe('importType(name)', function () {
const context = testContext()

it("should return 'absolute' for node.js modules", function() {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What does 'node.js' mean here?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That means typo 😅

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fixed

@benmosher
Copy link
Member

LGTM! :shipit:

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Sep 1, 2016

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.03%) to 97.757% when pulling b9ec2ef on no-absolute-path into 28dbed8 on master.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

New rule: no-absolute-path

4 participants