Skip to content

Conversation

@appleboy
Copy link
Member

as title.

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Jan 12, 2018

Codecov Report

Merging #3360 into master will decrease coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #3360      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   35.05%   35.03%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         281      281              
  Lines       40559    40543      -16     
==========================================
- Hits        14219    14206      -13     
+ Misses      24236    24234       -2     
+ Partials     2104     2103       -1
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
models/user.go 39.75% <100%> (-0.4%) ⬇️
modules/process/manager.go 76.81% <0%> (-4.35%) ⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update f708829...4dab3b6. Read the comment docs.

@tboerger tboerger added the lgtm/need 2 This PR needs two approvals by maintainers to be considered for merging. label Jan 12, 2018
@tboerger tboerger added lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. and removed lgtm/need 2 This PR needs two approvals by maintainers to be considered for merging. labels Jan 12, 2018
@thehowl
Copy link
Contributor

thehowl commented Jan 12, 2018

LGTM

@tboerger tboerger added lgtm/done This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore. and removed lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. labels Jan 12, 2018
@lafriks
Copy link
Member

lafriks commented Jan 12, 2018

Is this PR really does not change behaviour?

@thehowl
Copy link
Contributor

thehowl commented Jan 12, 2018

I'm quite sure it should not: this is the update code on xorm, so it is always run. Are you perhaps referring to the code running in cases where it wouldn't have before? (e.g. user_mail.go#L225)

@appleboy
Copy link
Member Author

@lafriks No, just like @thehowl say.We always get user data from x.Get(user) before execute the Update(user) method.

@lunny
Copy link
Member

lunny commented Jan 13, 2018

LGTM

@lunny lunny added this to the 1.4.0 milestone Jan 13, 2018
@lunny lunny added the type/refactoring Existing code has been cleaned up. There should be no new functionality. label Jan 13, 2018
@lafriks lafriks merged commit 7a2a3fb into go-gitea:master Jan 13, 2018
@go-gitea go-gitea locked and limited conversation to collaborators Nov 23, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

lgtm/done This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore. type/refactoring Existing code has been cleaned up. There should be no new functionality.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants