Skip to content

Consider a system for "muxed" connections #10407

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
bradygaster opened this issue May 20, 2019 · 5 comments
Open

Consider a system for "muxed" connections #10407

bradygaster opened this issue May 20, 2019 · 5 comments
Labels
affected-medium This issue impacts approximately half of our customers area-signalr Includes: SignalR clients and servers Blazor ♥ SignalR This issue is related to the experience of Signal R and Blazor working together enhancement This issue represents an ask for new feature or an enhancement to an existing one Needs: Design This issue requires design work before implementating. Priority:3 Work that is nice to have severity-major This label is used by an internal tool
Milestone

Comments

@bradygaster
Copy link
Member

bradygaster commented May 20, 2019

Design a way to allow “muxed” connections so the Server would still need to make an outbound connection to itself or the service, but it would be one connection and all the actual virtual connections would be tunneled through it (like how the Service connects to the Server today). cc @anurse @danroth27 @halter73

During 3.0, we're currently committing to an implementation design, but not to the implementation.

@bradygaster bradygaster added the area-signalr Includes: SignalR clients and servers label May 20, 2019
@bradygaster bradygaster added this to the 3.0.0 milestone May 20, 2019
@analogrelay analogrelay removed this from the 3.0.0 milestone May 20, 2019
@analogrelay
Copy link
Contributor

Clearing the milestone. We'll milestone it in Triage. I'd like to keep things out of the 3.0.0 milestone unless they are epics.

@analogrelay analogrelay added the triage-focus Add this label to flag the issue for focus at triage label May 20, 2019
@analogrelay analogrelay added this to the 3.0.0-preview7 milestone May 21, 2019
@analogrelay analogrelay removed the triage-focus Add this label to flag the issue for focus at triage label May 21, 2019
@analogrelay
Copy link
Contributor

We'll do some spiking and design work where we can in 3.0. Putting in preview 7 with low priority.

@analogrelay analogrelay added cost: XL Needs: Design This issue requires design work before implementating. enhancement This issue represents an ask for new feature or an enhancement to an existing one labels May 21, 2019
@analogrelay analogrelay changed the title Muxed connections design Consider a system for "muxed" connections May 30, 2019
@analogrelay analogrelay modified the milestones: 3.0.0-preview7, Backlog May 30, 2019
@analogrelay
Copy link
Contributor

We know (and knew when filing this) that we can't get it done for 3.0. This was originally just tracking the design process. Moving to the backlog to clarify that and renaming to cover the actual work.

@analogrelay analogrelay modified the milestones: Backlog, 5.0.0 Jul 30, 2019
@analogrelay
Copy link
Contributor

For context: This is a way to make using SignalR from Blazor server-side not suck.

@analogrelay analogrelay added the Blazor ♥ SignalR This issue is related to the experience of Signal R and Blazor working together label Jul 30, 2019
@analogrelay analogrelay modified the milestones: 5.0.0, Backlog Feb 12, 2020
@BrennanConroy BrennanConroy added affected-medium This issue impacts approximately half of our customers severity-major This label is used by an internal tool labels Nov 9, 2020 — with ASP.NET Core Issue Ranking
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Jan 13, 2022

Thanks for contacting us.

We're moving this issue to the .NET 7 Planning milestone for future evaluation / consideration. We would like to keep this around to collect more feedback, which can help us with prioritizing this work. We will re-evaluate this issue, during our next planning meeting(s).
If we later determine, that the issue has no community involvement, or it's very rare and low-impact issue, we will close it - so that the team can focus on more important and high impact issues.
To learn more about what to expect next and how this issue will be handled you can read more about our triage process here.

@rafikiassumani-msft rafikiassumani-msft added Cost:XL Priority:1 Work that is critical for the release, but we could probably ship without Priority:3 Work that is nice to have and removed [obsolete] cost: XL Priority:1 Work that is critical for the release, but we could probably ship without labels Jan 13, 2022
@BrennanConroy BrennanConroy modified the milestones: .NET 8 Planning, Backlog Mar 2, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
affected-medium This issue impacts approximately half of our customers area-signalr Includes: SignalR clients and servers Blazor ♥ SignalR This issue is related to the experience of Signal R and Blazor working together enhancement This issue represents an ask for new feature or an enhancement to an existing one Needs: Design This issue requires design work before implementating. Priority:3 Work that is nice to have severity-major This label is used by an internal tool
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants