Skip to content

non_constant_identifier_names false positives for pattern fields #59123

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
pq opened this issue Apr 21, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by dart-archive/linter#4300
Closed

non_constant_identifier_names false positives for pattern fields #59123

pq opened this issue Apr 21, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by dart-archive/linter#4300
Assignees
Labels
devexp-linter Issues with the analyzer's support for the linter package legacy-area-analyzer Use area-devexp instead. linter-false-positive linter-set-core linter-set-recommended P1 A high priority bug; for example, a single project is unusable or has many test failures

Comments

@pq
Copy link
Member

pq commented Apr 21, 2023

Follow-up from #59122.

Repro:

f(Object o) {
  switch(o) {
    case (:int AB, var b):
  }
}
@pq pq self-assigned this Apr 21, 2023
@pq pq added linter-false-positive P1 A high priority bug; for example, a single project is unusable or has many test failures linter-set-recommended linter-set-core and removed linter-set-recommended linter-set-core labels Apr 21, 2023
@devoncarew devoncarew added devexp-linter Issues with the analyzer's support for the linter package legacy-area-analyzer Use area-devexp instead. labels Nov 19, 2024
@devoncarew devoncarew transferred this issue from dart-archive/linter Nov 19, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
devexp-linter Issues with the analyzer's support for the linter package legacy-area-analyzer Use area-devexp instead. linter-false-positive linter-set-core linter-set-recommended P1 A high priority bug; for example, a single project is unusable or has many test failures
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants