Skip to content

proposal: function_expression_with_incorrect_types #59114

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
1 of 5 tasks
a14n opened this issue Apr 18, 2023 · 0 comments
Open
1 of 5 tasks

proposal: function_expression_with_incorrect_types #59114

a14n opened this issue Apr 18, 2023 · 0 comments
Labels
area-devexp For issues related to the analysis server, IDE support, linter, `dart fix`, and diagnostic messages. devexp-linter Issues with the analyzer's support for the linter package linter-lint-proposal linter-status-pending P3 A lower priority bug or feature request type-enhancement A request for a change that isn't a bug

Comments

@a14n
Copy link
Contributor

a14n commented Apr 18, 2023

function_expression_with_incorrect_types

Description

Use the parameter types expected by the target in function expression.

Details

With always_specify_types you have to add type annotations on everything. With function expressions it's always a code smell to have a type that doesn't match the declared parameter types.

Kind

Avoiding code smell.

Bad Examples

f(void Function(int a) p) {}

f((int? a) {});
f((num a) {});

Good Examples

f(void Function(int a) p) {}

f((a) {});
f((int a) {});

Discussion

At the time of the creation of this lint implementation (#2530) there were several diagnostics in Flutter codebase.

Discussion checklist

  • List any existing rules this proposal modifies, complements, overlaps or conflicts with.
  • List any relevant issues (reported here, the SDK Tracker, or elsewhere).
  • If there's any prior art (e.g., in other linters), please add references here.
  • If this proposal corresponds to Effective Dart or Flutter Style Guide advice, please call it out. (If there isn't any corresponding advice, should there be?)
  • If this proposal is motivated by real-world examples, please provide as many details as you can. Demonstrating potential impact is especially valuable.
@pq pq added the P3 A lower priority bug or feature request label May 22, 2023
@srawlins srawlins added the type-enhancement A request for a change that isn't a bug label Mar 27, 2024
@devoncarew devoncarew added devexp-linter Issues with the analyzer's support for the linter package legacy-area-analyzer Use area-devexp instead. labels Nov 19, 2024
@devoncarew devoncarew transferred this issue from dart-archive/linter Nov 19, 2024
@bwilkerson bwilkerson added area-devexp For issues related to the analysis server, IDE support, linter, `dart fix`, and diagnostic messages. and removed legacy-area-analyzer Use area-devexp instead. labels Feb 21, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area-devexp For issues related to the analysis server, IDE support, linter, `dart fix`, and diagnostic messages. devexp-linter Issues with the analyzer's support for the linter package linter-lint-proposal linter-status-pending P3 A lower priority bug or feature request type-enhancement A request for a change that isn't a bug
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants