Skip to content

Archive arm dartsdks on every revision #25702

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
mkustermann opened this issue Feb 5, 2016 · 2 comments
Closed

Archive arm dartsdks on every revision #25702

mkustermann opened this issue Feb 5, 2016 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
area-infrastructure Use area-infrastructure for SDK infrastructure issues, like continuous integration bot changes. os-linux type-enhancement A request for a change that isn't a bug

Comments

@mkustermann
Copy link
Member

Currently the dartsdk builders do not seem to archive arm sdk zip files.

The dartsdk bundles can be found e.g. here for a bleeding edge revision and it is missing an arm version:

$ gsutil ls gs://dart-archive/channels/be/raw/136190/sdk/
...

Same is true for all builders, also for stable (see gs://dart-archive/channels/stable/raw/1.14.1/sdk). There is also no support for that in the GCSNamer.

But they suddenly appear in the promoted release folder. Comparing the timestamps on them (e.g. gsutil ls -lh gs://dart-archive/channels/stable/release/1.14.1/sdk) it looks like they are uploaded from the side from somewhere else. From where?

@whesse Can't we have dartsdks for arm be archived as everything else on each revision?

Some context: Dartino is using DartVM binaries from specific revisions (sometimes from bleeding edge) and we have to get the binary for linux/linux-arm/mac/windows. So for now we need to log into the buildbot to get them, since they don't seem to be automatically archived.

cc @ricowind

@mkustermann mkustermann added triaged area-infrastructure Use area-infrastructure for SDK infrastructure issues, like continuous integration bot changes. labels Feb 5, 2016
@whesse whesse self-assigned this Feb 5, 2016
@whesse
Copy link
Contributor

whesse commented Feb 5, 2016

Yes, this is clear, we need to create the SDK on the builders rather than creating one afterwards by a hack.

@kevmoo kevmoo added type-enhancement A request for a change that isn't a bug and removed triaged labels Mar 1, 2016
@athomas
Copy link
Member

athomas commented Jul 2, 2019

Fixed.

@athomas athomas closed this as completed Jul 2, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area-infrastructure Use area-infrastructure for SDK infrastructure issues, like continuous integration bot changes. os-linux type-enhancement A request for a change that isn't a bug
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants