Skip to content

formatting: is there a more compact way to display constants? #12677

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
DartBot opened this issue Aug 22, 2013 · 3 comments
Closed

formatting: is there a more compact way to display constants? #12677

DartBot opened this issue Aug 22, 2013 · 3 comments
Labels
closed-duplicate Closed in favor of an existing report type-enhancement A request for a change that isn't a bug

Comments

@DartBot
Copy link

DartBot commented Aug 22, 2013

This issue was originally filed by [email protected]

http://testing.mem-apidocs.appspot.com/#dart-core/DateTime

scroll down to Properties.

The constants could be displayed more compactly.

mem
@iposva-google
Copy link
Contributor

Added Triaged label.

@alan-knight
Copy link
Contributor

Definitely. This seems like something to be dealt with in the general design review. I can imagine, for example, that if we have a large collection of non-commented const (static?) fields that we could group them into a list rather than displaying each one separately. Certainly in source code it's often the case that there would be a single comment ahead of a lot of them.

Added this to the Later milestone.
Removed Type-Defect, Priority-Unassigned labels.
Added Type-Enhancement, Priority-Medium labels.

@alan-knight
Copy link
Contributor

Added Duplicate label.
Marked as being merged into #2783.

@DartBot DartBot added Type-Enhancement closed-duplicate Closed in favor of an existing report labels Jan 17, 2014
@DartBot DartBot added this to the Later milestone Jan 17, 2014
@alan-knight alan-knight mentioned this issue Jun 3, 2015
Closed
@kevmoo kevmoo added type-enhancement A request for a change that isn't a bug and removed type-enhancement labels Mar 1, 2016
This issue was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
closed-duplicate Closed in favor of an existing report type-enhancement A request for a change that isn't a bug
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
4 participants
@kevmoo @alan-knight @iposva-google @DartBot